BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24263321)

  • 1. Comments on Hand-sewn Versus Mechanical Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Wang Q; He XR; Shi CH; Yang KH
    Ann Surg; 2015 Jun; 261(6):e156-7. PubMed ID: 24263321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reply to Letter: "Hand-sewn Versus Mechanical Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis".
    Honda M; Kuriyama A; Noma H; Nunobe S; Furukawa TA
    Ann Surg; 2015 Jun; 261(6):e157. PubMed ID: 24263333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is There No Significant Difference in the Incidence of Anastomotic Leakage Between the Hand-sewn and Mechanical Esophagogastric Anastomosis?
    Liu QX; Dai JG
    Ann Surg; 2015 Aug; 262(2):e81. PubMed ID: 24577327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Hand-sewn vs mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagus resection].
    Blömer M; Jähne J
    Chirurg; 2013 Jun; 84(6):524. PubMed ID: 23681369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reply to Letter: "Is There No Significant Difference in the Incidence of Anastomotic Leakage Between the Hand-sewn and Mechanical Esophagogastric Anastomosis?".
    Honda M; Kuriyama A; Noma H; Nunobe S; Furukawa TA
    Ann Surg; 2015 Aug; 262(2):e81-2. PubMed ID: 24670842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Honda M; Kuriyama A; Noma H; Nunobe S; Furukawa TA
    Ann Surg; 2013 Feb; 257(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 23001084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Deng XF; Liu QX; Zhou D; Min JX; Dai JG
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(15):4757-64. PubMed ID: 25914488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is hand sewing comparable with stapling for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy? A meta-analysis.
    Liu QX; Min JX; Deng XF; Dai JG
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 20(45):17218-26. PubMed ID: 25493038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Embedded Three-Layer Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Morbidity and Improves Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer.
    Sun HB; Li Y; Liu XB; Zhang RX; Wang ZF; Zheng Y; Qin JJ; Li HM; Chen XK; Wu Z
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1131-8. PubMed ID: 26687140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic review of the technique of colorectal anastomosis.
    Slieker JC; Daams F; Mulder IM; Jeekel J; Lange JF
    JAMA Surg; 2013 Feb; 148(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 23426599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Application of different intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis in surgery for esophageal cancer].
    Han Y; Zhang Y; Li H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 21(9):995-1000. PubMed ID: 30269318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Markar SR; Arya S; Karthikesalingam A; Hanna GB
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Dec; 20(13):4274-81. PubMed ID: 23943033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
    Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
    Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
    Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
    World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.
    Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of 5-mm Laparoscopic Stapler to Perform Open Small Bowel Anastomosis in a Neonatal Animal Model.
    Glenn IC; Bruns NE; Ponsky TA
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Oct; 26(10):840-844. PubMed ID: 27462959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Anastomoses in the upper gastrointestinal tract].
    Schwameis K; Zacherl J
    Chirurg; 2011 Jan; 82(1):26, 28-33. PubMed ID: 21174068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
    Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
    Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis.
    Orringer MB; Marshall B; Iannettoni MD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Feb; 119(2):277-88. PubMed ID: 10649203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis of hand-sewn versus mechanical gastrojejunal anastomosis during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.
    Jiang HP; Lin LL; Jiang X; Qiao HQ
    Int J Surg; 2016 Aug; 32():150-7. PubMed ID: 27107663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.