152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24263754)
1. Incidence of fetal anomalies after incomplete anatomic surveys between 16 and 22 weeks.
Waller SA; O'Connell K; Carter A; Gravett MG; Dighe M; Richardson ML; Dubinsky TJ
Ultrasound Q; 2013 Dec; 29(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 24263754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Utility of Repeat Midtrimester Anatomy Ultrasound for Anomaly Detection.
Wood SL; Owen J; Jenkins SM; Harper LM
Am J Perinatol; 2018 Dec; 35(14):1346-1351. PubMed ID: 29528470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Completion and Sensitivity of the Second-Trimester Fetal Anatomic Survey in Obese Gravidas.
Pasko DN; Wood SL; Jenkins SM; Owen J; Harper LM
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Nov; 35(11):2449-2457. PubMed ID: 27698181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency and Importance of Incomplete Screening Fetal Anatomic Sonography in Pregnancy.
Silvestri MT; Pettker CM; Raney JH; Xu X; Ross JS
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Dec; 35(12):2665-2673. PubMed ID: 27821652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What Is the Rate of Incomplete Fetal Anatomic Surveys During a Second-Trimester Scan? Retrospective Observational Study of 4000 Nonobese Pregnant Women.
Padula F; Gulino FA; Capriglione S; Giorlandino M; Cignini P; Mastrandrea ML; D'Emidio L; Giorlandino C
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2187-91. PubMed ID: 26507696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repeat anatomic surveys performed for an initial incomplete study: the sonographer and physician factors.
Lendrum TL; Shaffer RK; Heyborne KD
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 May; 4(3):100567. PubMed ID: 35085846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal timing of the second trimester fetal ultrasound in the obese gravida.
Weatherborn M; McGuinness B; Ogamba MI; Leung K; Leftwich HK
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jul; 35(14):2703-2707. PubMed ID: 32715824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility of follow-up standard sonography for fetal anomaly detection.
Byrne JJ; Morgan JL; Twickler DM; McIntire DD; Dashe JS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 222(6):615.e1-615.e9. PubMed ID: 31930994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost Analysis of Following Up Incomplete Low-Risk Fetal Anatomy Ultrasounds.
O'Brien K; Shainker SA; Modest AM; Spiel MH; Resetkova N; Shah N; Hacker MR
Birth; 2017 Mar; 44(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 27862256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Targeted mid-trimester ultrasound examination: how does fetal anatomic visualization depend upon the duration of the scan?
Catanzarite V; Delaney K; Wolfe S; Dowling D; Daneshmand S; Cousins L; Poeltler D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16142825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The advantages of early midtrimester targeted fetal systematic organ screening for the detection of fetal anomalies--will a global change start in Israel?].
Bronshtein M; Solt I; Blumenfeld Z
Harefuah; 2014 Jun; 153(6):320-4, 368. PubMed ID: 25095602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early anatomy ultrasound in women at increased risk of fetal anomalies.
Lim J; Whittle WL; Lee YM; Ryan G; Van Mieghem T
Prenat Diagn; 2013 Sep; 33(9):863-8. PubMed ID: 23658111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of the second-trimester fetal ultrasound examination in an unselected population at 18, 20 or 22 weeks of pregnancy: a randomized trial.
Schwärzler P; Senat MV; Holden D; Bernard JP; Masroor T; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Aug; 14(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 10492867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Second trimester ultrasound screening performed by midwives; sensitivity for detection of fetal anomalies.
Eurenius K; Axelsson O; Cnattingius S; Eriksson L; Norsted T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Feb; 78(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 10023870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Routine ultrasound screening and detection of congenital anomalies outside a university setting.
Nakling J; Backe B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Nov; 84(11):1042-8. PubMed ID: 16232170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Ultrasound screening and diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities between 11-14 gestational weeks].
Markov D; Chernev T; Dimitrova V; Mazneĭkova V; Leroy Y; Jacquemyn Y; Ramaekers P; Van Bulck B; Loquet P
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2004; 43(3):3-10. PubMed ID: 15341249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can early ultrasound reduce the gestational age at abortion for fetal anomalies?
Chasen ST; Kalish RB
Contraception; 2013 Jan; 87(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 23089048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of maternal body mass index on fetal anomaly screening.
Hunsley C; Farrell T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():181-4. PubMed ID: 25305661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Learning curve in ultrasonographic screening for selected fetal structural anomalies in early pregnancy.
Taipale P; Ammälä M; Salonen R; Hiilesmaa V
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 101(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 12576250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Role of Early Gestation Ultrasound in the Assessment of Fetal Anatomy in Maternal Obesity.
Romary L; Sinkovskaya E; Ali S; Cunningham TD; Marwitz S; Heeze A; Herlands L; Porche L; Philips J; Abuhamad A
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1161-1168. PubMed ID: 28417475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
