BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24264791)

  • 1. Assessment of abdominoperineal resection rate as a surrogate marker of hospital quality in rectal cancer surgery.
    Jorgensen ML; Young JM; Dobbins TA; Solomon MJ
    Br J Surg; 2013 Nov; 100(12):1655-63. PubMed ID: 24264791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of abdominoperineal resection rate as a surrogate marker of hospital quality in rectal cancer surgery (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 1655-1663).
    Byrne B; Bottle A; Faiz O
    Br J Surg; 2014 May; 101(6):736. PubMed ID: 24723027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Author's reply: Assessment of abdominoperineal resection rate as a surrogate marker of hospital quality in rectal cancer surgery (Br J Surg 2013; 100: 1655-1663).
    Jorgensen M
    Br J Surg; 2014 May; 101(6):736. PubMed ID: 24723026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Better operative outcomes achieved with the prone jackknife vs. lithotomy position during abdominoperineal resection in patients with low rectal cancer.
    Liu P; Bao H; Zhang X; Zhang J; Ma L; Wang Y; Li C; Wang Z; Gong P
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():39. PubMed ID: 25889121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of total mesorectal excision on the results of surgery of distal rectal cancer.
    Law WL; Chu KW
    Br J Surg; 2001 Dec; 88(12):1607-12. PubMed ID: 11736973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morbidity and mortality following abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma.
    Luna-Pérez P; Rodríguez-Ramírez S; Vega J; Sandoval E; Labastida S
    Rev Invest Clin; 2001; 53(5):388-95. PubMed ID: 11795103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.
    Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assessment of colorectal cancer care: an international online model.
    Mroczkowski P; Kube R; Schmidt U; Gastinger I; Lippert H
    Colorectal Dis; 2011 Aug; 13(8):890-5. PubMed ID: 20478007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized clinical trial of conventional versus cylindrical abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced lower rectal cancer.
    Han JG; Wang ZJ; Wei GH; Gao ZG; Yang Y; Zhao BC
    Am J Surg; 2012 Sep; 204(3):274-82. PubMed ID: 22920402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.
    Ng SS; Leung KL; Lee JF; Yiu RY; Li JC; Teoh AY; Leung WW
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2418-25. PubMed ID: 18392659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of including cancer-specific variables on risk-adjusted hospital surgical quality comparisons.
    Merkow RP; Bentrem DJ; Winchester DP; Stewart AK; Ko CY; Bilimoria KY
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):1766-73. PubMed ID: 23354565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A retrospective analysis of ultralow anterior resection vs. abdomino-perineal resection for lower rectal cancer.
    Yang Z; Xu H; Zhang W; Xu Y; Xu Z
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2012 Sep; 59(118):1780-3. PubMed ID: 22246189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.
    den Dulk M; Marijnen CA; Putter H; Rutten HJ; Beets GL; Wiggers T; Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ
    Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17592295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abdominoperineal resection or anterior resection for rectal cancer: patient preferences before and after treatment.
    Zolciak A; Bujko K; Kepka L; Oledzki J; Rutkowski A; Nowacki MP
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Sep; 8(7):575-80. PubMed ID: 16919109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for anorectal cancer.
    Iroatulam AJ; Agachan F; Alabaz O; Weiss EG; Nogueras JJ; Wexner SD
    Am Surg; 1998 Jan; 64(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 9457031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of quality of care through hospital discharge reports: an example of rectal cancer surgery].
    Rosato R; Ciccone G; Farina EC; Gelormino E; Pagano E; Senore C; Merletti F
    Epidemiol Prev; 2003; 27(4):207-14. PubMed ID: 14651025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do patients requiring a multivisceral resection for rectal cancer have worse oncologic outcomes than patients undergoing only abdominoperineal resection?
    Dosokey EMG; Brady JT; Neupane R; Jabir MA; Stein SL; Reynolds HL; Delaney CP; Steele SR
    Am J Surg; 2017 Sep; 214(3):416-420. PubMed ID: 28622838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in surgical approach to rectal cancer.
    Buckspan RJ; Sawyers JL
    Am Surg; 1985 Jan; 51(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 3881064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abdominoperineal resection or low Hartmann's procedure.
    Frye JN; Carne PW; Robertson GM; Frizelle FA
    ANZ J Surg; 2004 Jul; 74(7):537-40. PubMed ID: 15230785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uptake and outcomes of laparoscopically assisted resection for colon and rectal cancer in Australia: a population-based study.
    Dobbins TA; Young JM; Solomon MJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Apr; 57(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 24608296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.