These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24264942)

  • 1. A global machine learning based scoring function for protein structure prediction.
    Faraggi E; Kloczkowski A
    Proteins; 2014 May; 82(5):752-9. PubMed ID: 24264942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Novel nonlinear knowledge-based mean force potentials based on machine learning.
    Dong Q; Zhou S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(2):476-86. PubMed ID: 20820079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protein secondary structure prediction with SPARROW.
    Bettella F; Rasinski D; Knapp EW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Feb; 52(2):545-56. PubMed ID: 22224407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protein structure evaluation using an all-atom energy based empirical scoring function.
    Narang P; Bhushan K; Bose S; Jayaram B
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2006 Feb; 23(4):385-406. PubMed ID: 16363875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Native fold and docking pose discrimination by the same residue-based scoring function.
    Sarti E; Granata D; Seno F; Trovato A; Laio A
    Proteins; 2015 Apr; 83(4):621-30. PubMed ID: 25619680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SVR_CAF: an integrated score function for detecting native protein structures among decoys.
    Zhou J; Yan W; Hu G; Shen B
    Proteins; 2014 Apr; 82(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 24115148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction.
    Hsieh MJ; Luo R
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 15229881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. GENN: a GEneral Neural Network for learning tabulated data with examples from protein structure prediction.
    Faraggi E; Kloczkowski A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1260():165-78. PubMed ID: 25502381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A machine learning information retrieval approach to protein fold recognition.
    Cheng J; Baldi P
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1456-63. PubMed ID: 16547073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consensus scoring for enriching near-native structures from protein-protein docking decoys.
    Liang S; Meroueh SO; Wang G; Qiu C; Zhou Y
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 18831053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.
    Zhang Y; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 2004 Dec; 57(4):702-10. PubMed ID: 15476259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protein structure prediction using residue- and fragment-environment potentials in CASP11.
    Kim H; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):105-17. PubMed ID: 26344195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The victor/FRST function for model quality estimation.
    Tosatto SC
    J Comput Biol; 2005 Dec; 12(10):1316-27. PubMed ID: 16379537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Network properties of decoys and CASP predicted models: a comparison with native protein structures.
    Chatterjee S; Ghosh S; Vishveshwara S
    Mol Biosyst; 2013 Jul; 9(7):1774-88. PubMed ID: 23694935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical geometry based prediction of nonsynonymous SNP functional effects using random forest and neuro-fuzzy classifiers.
    Barenboim M; Masso M; Vaisman II; Jamison DC
    Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1930-9. PubMed ID: 18186470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Princeton_TIGRESS: protein geometry refinement using simulations and support vector machines.
    Khoury GA; Tamamis P; Pinnaduwage N; Smadbeck J; Kieslich CA; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2014 May; 82(5):794-814. PubMed ID: 24174311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a new meta-score for protein structure prediction from seven all-atom distance dependent potentials using support vector regression.
    Shirota M; Ishida T; Kinoshita K
    Genome Inform; 2009 Oct; 23(1):149-58. PubMed ID: 20180270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Refinement of pairwise potentials via logistic regression to score protein-protein interactions.
    Tanemura KA; Pei J; Merz KM
    Proteins; 2020 Dec; 88(12):1559-1568. PubMed ID: 32729132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using correlated parameters for improved ranking of protein-protein docking decoys.
    Mitra P; Pal D
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(5):787-96. PubMed ID: 20941737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.