These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24265123)

  • 1. Confidence interval estimation of the difference between two sensitivities to the early disease stage.
    Dong T; Kang L; Hutson A; Xiong C; Tian L
    Biom J; 2014 Mar; 56(2):270-86. PubMed ID: 24265123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confidence Interval Estimation for Sensitivity to the Early Diseased Stage Based on Empirical Likelihood.
    Dong T; Tian L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(6):1215-33. PubMed ID: 25372999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals of the probability of identifying early disease stage given sensitivity to full disease and specificity with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Dong T; Tian L; Hutson A; Xiong C
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(30):3532-45. PubMed ID: 22139763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linear combinations of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories.
    Kang L; Xiong C; Crane P; Tian L
    Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(4):631-43. PubMed ID: 22865796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical likelihood confidence interval for sensitivity to the early disease stage.
    Rahman H; Zhao Y;
    Pharm Stat; 2022 May; 21(3):566-583. PubMed ID: 34962077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Yan Y; Gao F; Yu K; Morris JC
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17763377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Joint confidence region estimation for area under ROC curve and Youden index.
    Yin J; Tian L
    Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(6):985-1000. PubMed ID: 24123069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating confidence intervals for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories without a gold standard.
    Kang L; Xiong C; Tian L
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2013 Dec; 68():. PubMed ID: 24415817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian and influence function-based empirical likelihoods for inference of sensitivity to the early diseased stage in diagnostic tests.
    Hai Y; Shi S; Qin G; For The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging
    Biom J; 2023 Mar; 65(3):e2200021. PubMed ID: 36642803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inverse probability weighting estimation of the volume under the ROC surface in the presence of verification bias.
    Zhang Y; Alonzo TA;
    Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1338-1356. PubMed ID: 27338713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confidence intervals for differences between volumes under receiver operating characteristic surfaces (VUS) and generalized Youden indices (GYIs).
    Yin J; Nakas CT; Tian L; Reiser B
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):675-688. PubMed ID: 29233075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Morris JC
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1251-73. PubMed ID: 16345029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of the diagnostic threshold accounting for decision costs and sampling uncertainty.
    Skaltsa K; Jover L; Carrasco JL
    Biom J; 2010 Oct; 52(5):676-97. PubMed ID: 20976697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic thresholds with three ordinal groups.
    Attwood K; Tian L; Xiong C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):608-33. PubMed ID: 24707966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A family of estimators to diagnostic accuracy when candidate tests are subject to detection limits-Application to diagnosing early stage Alzheimer disease.
    Xiong C; Luo J; Agboola F; Grant E; Morris JC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 May; 31(5):882-898. PubMed ID: 35044258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confidence interval estimation for sensitivity and difference between two sensitivities at a given specificity under tree ordering.
    Gao Y; Tian L
    Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(16):3695-3723. PubMed ID: 33906262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Difference of two dependent sensitivities and specificities: Comparison of various approaches.
    Wenzel D; Zapf A
    Biom J; 2013 Sep; 55(5):705-18. PubMed ID: 23828661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Partial Youden index and its inferences.
    Li C; Chen J; Qin G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):385-399. PubMed ID: 30359546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Youden index and Associated Cut-points for Three Ordinal Diagnostic Groups.
    Luo J; Xiong C
    Commun Stat Simul Comput; 2013 Jan; 42(6):1213-1234. PubMed ID: 23794784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new accuracy metric under three classes when subclasses are involved and its confidence interval estimation.
    Nan N; Tian L
    Stat Med; 2023 Dec; 42(28):5207-5228. PubMed ID: 37779490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.