144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24265123)
1. Confidence interval estimation of the difference between two sensitivities to the early disease stage.
Dong T; Kang L; Hutson A; Xiong C; Tian L
Biom J; 2014 Mar; 56(2):270-86. PubMed ID: 24265123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Confidence Interval Estimation for Sensitivity to the Early Diseased Stage Based on Empirical Likelihood.
Dong T; Tian L
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(6):1215-33. PubMed ID: 25372999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals of the probability of identifying early disease stage given sensitivity to full disease and specificity with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
Dong T; Tian L; Hutson A; Xiong C
Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(30):3532-45. PubMed ID: 22139763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Linear combinations of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories.
Kang L; Xiong C; Crane P; Tian L
Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(4):631-43. PubMed ID: 22865796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Empirical likelihood confidence interval for sensitivity to the early disease stage.
Rahman H; Zhao Y;
Pharm Stat; 2022 May; 21(3):566-583. PubMed ID: 34962077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Yan Y; Gao F; Yu K; Morris JC
Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17763377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Joint confidence region estimation for area under ROC curve and Youden index.
Yin J; Tian L
Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(6):985-1000. PubMed ID: 24123069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating confidence intervals for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories without a gold standard.
Kang L; Xiong C; Tian L
Comput Stat Data Anal; 2013 Dec; 68():. PubMed ID: 24415817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian and influence function-based empirical likelihoods for inference of sensitivity to the early diseased stage in diagnostic tests.
Hai Y; Shi S; Qin G; For The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging
Biom J; 2023 Mar; 65(3):e2200021. PubMed ID: 36642803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inverse probability weighting estimation of the volume under the ROC surface in the presence of verification bias.
Zhang Y; Alonzo TA;
Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1338-1356. PubMed ID: 27338713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confidence intervals for differences between volumes under receiver operating characteristic surfaces (VUS) and generalized Youden indices (GYIs).
Yin J; Nakas CT; Tian L; Reiser B
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):675-688. PubMed ID: 29233075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.
Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Morris JC
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1251-73. PubMed ID: 16345029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of the diagnostic threshold accounting for decision costs and sampling uncertainty.
Skaltsa K; Jover L; Carrasco JL
Biom J; 2010 Oct; 52(5):676-97. PubMed ID: 20976697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic thresholds with three ordinal groups.
Attwood K; Tian L; Xiong C
J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):608-33. PubMed ID: 24707966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A family of estimators to diagnostic accuracy when candidate tests are subject to detection limits-Application to diagnosing early stage Alzheimer disease.
Xiong C; Luo J; Agboola F; Grant E; Morris JC
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 May; 31(5):882-898. PubMed ID: 35044258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Confidence interval estimation for sensitivity and difference between two sensitivities at a given specificity under tree ordering.
Gao Y; Tian L
Stat Med; 2021 Jul; 40(16):3695-3723. PubMed ID: 33906262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Difference of two dependent sensitivities and specificities: Comparison of various approaches.
Wenzel D; Zapf A
Biom J; 2013 Sep; 55(5):705-18. PubMed ID: 23828661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Partial Youden index and its inferences.
Li C; Chen J; Qin G
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):385-399. PubMed ID: 30359546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Youden index and Associated Cut-points for Three Ordinal Diagnostic Groups.
Luo J; Xiong C
Commun Stat Simul Comput; 2013 Jan; 42(6):1213-1234. PubMed ID: 23794784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new accuracy metric under three classes when subclasses are involved and its confidence interval estimation.
Nan N; Tian L
Stat Med; 2023 Dec; 42(28):5207-5228. PubMed ID: 37779490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
