These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24265258)

  • 1. A comparison of 30-day surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open sacrocolpopexy.
    Tyson MD; Wolter CE
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Feb; 34(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 24265258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Linder BJ; Occhino JA; Habermann EB; Glasgow AE; Bews KA; Gershman B
    J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):862-867. PubMed ID: 29630983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.
    Linder BJ; Gershman B; Bews KA; Glasgow AE; Occhino JA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(5):342-346. PubMed ID: 30628947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
    Kisby CK; Occhino JA; Bews KA; Habermann EB; Linder BJ
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. National Assessment of Advancing Age on Perioperative Morbidity and Length of Stay Associated With Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Chaudhry Z; Cohen SA; Tarnay C
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(6):482-485. PubMed ID: 27636219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
    Nosti PA; Umoh Andy U; Kane S; White DE; Harvie HS; Lowenstein L; Gutman RE
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 24368486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Yadav GS; Gaddam N; Rahn DD
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 27(3):133-139. PubMed ID: 33620894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.
    Liu JJ; Maxwell BG; Panousis P; Chung BI
    Urology; 2013 Sep; 82(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 23876584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complications after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant incontinence surgery: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database study.
    Clancy AA; Mallick R; Breau RH; Khalil H; Hickling DR
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Sep; 37(7):2234-2241. PubMed ID: 29635701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    De Gouveia De Sa M; Claydon LS; Whitlow B; Dolcet Artahona MA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 26249236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women.
    Joubert M; Thubert T; Lefranc JP; Vaessen C; Chartier-Kastler É; Deffieux X; Rouprêt M
    Prog Urol; 2014 Dec; 24(17):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25450756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with 24-hour hospital stay for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Moscatiello P; Carracedo D; Sánchez MD; Gimbernat H; San Román J; Barba R; Durán M; Sánchez M
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2019 Nov; 43(9):509-514. PubMed ID: 31202593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perioperative outcomes of reconstructive surgery for apical prolapse in the very elderly: a national contemporary analysis.
    Yadav GS; Chapman GC; Raju R; El-Nashar SA; Occhino JA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1391-1398. PubMed ID: 33638678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of minimally invasive surgery on the risk for surgical site infections: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database.
    Gandaglia G; Ghani KR; Sood A; Meyers JR; Sammon JD; Schmid M; Varda B; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Sun M; Menon M; Kibel AS; Trinh QD
    JAMA Surg; 2014 Oct; 149(10):1039-44. PubMed ID: 25143176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of surgical start time in patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Jallad K; Barber MD; Ridgeway B; Paraiso MF; Unger CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1535-9. PubMed ID: 27026142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.