172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24265395)
1. Influence of object location in different FOVs on trabecular bone microstructure measurements of human mandible: a cone beam CT study.
Ibrahim N; Parsa A; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Aartman IH; Nambiar P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(2):20130329. PubMed ID: 24265395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of anterior and posterior trabecular bone microstructure of human mandible using cone-beam CT and micro CT.
Ibrahim N; Parsa A; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Rahmat RA; Ismail SM; Aartman IHA
BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):249. PubMed ID: 33964918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of bone microstructure in the wrist using cone-beam computed tomography.
Mys K; Stockmans F; Vereecke E; van Lenthe GH
Bone; 2018 Sep; 114():206-214. PubMed ID: 29909060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative evaluation of cone beam CT and micro-CT on trabecular bone structures in the human mandible.
Van Dessel J; Huang Y; Depypere M; Rubira-Bullen I; Maes F; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130145. PubMed ID: 23833320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of scan parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructural measurements of human mandible.
Ibrahim N; Parsa A; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Aartman IH; Wismeijer D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130206. PubMed ID: 24404603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of trabecular bone microstructural measurement at planned dental implant sites using cone-beam CT datasets.
Ibrahim N; Parsa A; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Aartman IH; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):941-5. PubMed ID: 23581278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
González-García R; Monje F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of scan parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructural measurements of the human mandible.
Ibrahim N; Parsa A; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Aartman IH; Wismeijer D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130206. PubMed ID: 24132024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating trabecular microstructure of mandible and axis in osteoporosis, diabetes and chronic kidney disease using cone beam computed tomography.
Bilgili E; Üçok CÖ
Oral Radiol; 2023 Jan; 39(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 35355163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
Lofthag-Hansen S
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of exposure parameters and voxel size on bone structure analysis in CBCT.
Pauwels R; Faruangsaeng T; Charoenkarn T; Ngonphloy N; Panmekiate S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150078. PubMed ID: 26054572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an implant site.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(3):79884780. PubMed ID: 22933535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of artefacts generated by titanium and zirconium implants in the study of trabecular bone architecture in cone-beam CT images.
Vitulli I; Fontenele RC; Nascimento EHL; Freitas DQ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Sep; 51(6):20220066. PubMed ID: 35466693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trabecular bone structural parameters evaluated using dental cone-beam computed tomography: cellular synthetic bones.
Ho JT; Wu J; Huang HL; Chen MY; Fuh LJ; Hsu JT
Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Nov; 12():115. PubMed ID: 24207062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of maxillary trabecular microstructure as an indicator of implant stability by using 2 cone beam computed tomography systems and micro-computed tomography.
Kulah K; Gulsahi A; Kamburoğlu K; Geneci F; Ocak M; Celik HH; Ozen T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Mar; 127(3):247-256. PubMed ID: 30595501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of reconstruction parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructure quantification in sheep.
Muhammad AMA; Ibrahim N; Ahmad R; Asif MK; Radzi Z; Zaini ZM; Razak HRA
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Feb; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 32041589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of jawbone trabecular bone structure amongst osteoporotic women by cone-beam computed tomography: the OSTEOSYR project.
Barngkgei I; Al Haffar I; Shaarani E; Khattab R; Mashlah A
J Investig Clin Dent; 2016 Nov; 7(4):332-340. PubMed ID: 26097193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
