These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24266390)

  • 1. Different predictors of multiple-target search accuracy between nonprofessional and professional visual searchers.
    Biggs AT; Mitroff SR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1335-48. PubMed ID: 24266390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in multiple-target visual search performance between non-professional and professional searchers due to decision-making criteria.
    Biggs AT; Mitroff SR
    Br J Psychol; 2015 Nov; 106(4):551-63. PubMed ID: 25266971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Context matters: the structure of task goals affects accuracy in multiple-target visual search.
    Clark K; Cain MS; Adcock RA; Mitroff SR
    Appl Ergon; 2014 May; 45(3):528-33. PubMed ID: 23957930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual search performance is predicted by the degree to which selective attention to features modulates the ERP between 350 and 600ms.
    Milne E; Dunn SA; Freeth M; Rosas-Martinez L
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 May; 51(6):1109-18. PubMed ID: 23499721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anticipatory anxiety hinders detection of a second target in dual-target search.
    Cain MS; Dunsmoor JE; LaBar KS; Mitroff SR
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jul; 22(7):866-71. PubMed ID: 21670427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A little bit of history repeating: Splitting up multiple-target visual searches decreases second-target miss errors.
    Cain MS; Biggs AT; Darling EF; Mitroff SR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Jun; 20(2):112-25. PubMed ID: 24708353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of age and exogenous support on visual search performance.
    McLaughlin PM; Murtha SJ
    Exp Aging Res; 2010 Jul; 36(3):325-45. PubMed ID: 20544451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search.
    Cain MS; Vul E; Clark K; Mitroff SR
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1047-54. PubMed ID: 22868494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.
    Poole BJ; Kane MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Running the figure to the ground: figure-ground segmentation during visual search.
    Ralph BC; Seli P; Cheng VO; Solman GJ; Smilek D
    Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():65-73. PubMed ID: 24582768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining perceptual and conceptual set biases in multiple-target visual search.
    Biggs AT; Adamo SH; Dowd EW; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):844-55. PubMed ID: 25678271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memory for found targets interferes with subsequent performance in multiple-target visual search.
    Cain MS; Mitroff SR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1398-408. PubMed ID: 23163788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting Airport Screening Officers' Visual Search Competency With a Rapid Assessment.
    Mitroff SR; Ericson JM; Sharpe B
    Hum Factors; 2018 Mar; 60(2):201-211. PubMed ID: 29193997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Active search for multiple targets is inefficient.
    Verghese P
    Vision Res; 2012 Dec; 74():61-71. PubMed ID: 22929812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemispheric asymmetries in visual search.
    Poynter W; Roberts C
    Laterality; 2012; 17(6):711-26. PubMed ID: 23098199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of multidimensional targets in visual search.
    Monnier P
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(24):4083-90. PubMed ID: 17007899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring search efficiency in complex visual search tasks: global and local clutter.
    Beck MR; Lohrenz MC; Trafton JG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Sep; 16(3):238-50. PubMed ID: 20853984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual search for rare targets: distracter tuning as a mechanism for learning from repeated target-absent searches.
    Levin DT; Angelone BL; Beck MR
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 102(3):313-27. PubMed ID: 21751991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.