These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24266456)

  • 1. Reply: Obstetric injury claims are not happening at random; the size of the labor unit matters.
    Milland M; Christoffersen JK; Hedegaard M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jan; 93(1):119. PubMed ID: 24266456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reply: The advantages of a centralized compensation system for handling obstetric injury claims.
    Milland M; Christoffersen JK; Hedegaard M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Apr; 93(4):431-2. PubMed ID: 24359334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health system composition, rather than labor ward size, should be the basis for determining obstetric legal issues.
    Lee HH; Kim TH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Apr; 93(4):430-1. PubMed ID: 24299264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The size is not important.
    Nielsen M; Clausen JA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jan; 93(1):118. PubMed ID: 24116871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The size of the labor wards: is bigger better when it comes to patient safety?
    Milland M; Christoffersen JK; Hedegaard M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1271-6. PubMed ID: 24015949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A nationwide descriptive study of obstetric claims for compensation in Norway.
    Andreasen S; Backe B; Jørstad RG; Oian P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Oct; 91(10):1191-5. PubMed ID: 22486308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comprehensive obstetric patient safety program reduces liability claims and payments.
    Pettker CM; Thung SF; Lipkind HS; Illuzzi JL; Buhimschi CS; Raab CA; Copel JA; Lockwood CJ; Funai EF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 211(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 24925798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Severe and fatal obstetric injury claims in relation to labor unit volume.
    Milland M; Mikkelsen KL; Christoffersen JK; Hedegaard M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 May; 94(5):534-41. PubMed ID: 25659972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Claims for compensation after alleged birth asphyxia: a nationwide study covering 15 years.
    Andreasen S; Backe B; Øian P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Feb; 93(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 24237480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safe deliveries.
    Carpenter D
    Hosp Health Netw; 2004 Nov; 78(11):56-8, 60, 1. PubMed ID: 15597699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Claims to the Norwegian Patient Compensation System after neurosurgical treatment].
    Wikstrøm H; Hansen TE; Ingebrigtsen T
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2003 Feb; 123(4):444-6. PubMed ID: 12643053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving patient safety by detecting obstetric care-related adverse events: application of a new screening guide.
    Aibar L; Rabanaque MJ; Mozas J; Puertas A; Aranaz JM; Aibar C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 May; 289(5):945-52. PubMed ID: 24202544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No-fault compensation for treatment injury in New Zealand: identifying threats to patient safety in primary care.
    Wallis K; Dovey S
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2011 Jul; 20(7):587-91. PubMed ID: 21228439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The consistency of experts' evaluation of obstetric claims for compensation.
    Andreasen S; Backe B; Lydersen S; Øvrebø K; Øian P
    BJOG; 2015 Jun; 122(7):948-53. PubMed ID: 25155624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A systematic approach to the identification and classification of near-miss events on labor and delivery in a large, national health care system.
    Clark SL; Meyers JA; Frye DR; McManus K; Perlin JB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Dec; 207(6):441-5. PubMed ID: 23063015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient safety and adverse events related with obstetric care.
    Aibar L; Rabanaque MJ; Aibar C; Aranaz JM; Mozas J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):825-30. PubMed ID: 25245667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adverse events detected by clinical surveillance on an obstetric service.
    Forster AJ; Fung I; Caughey S; Oppenheimer L; Beach C; Shojania KG; van Walraven C
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1073-83. PubMed ID: 17077227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient injuries from anesthesia gas delivery equipment: a closed claims update.
    Mehta SP; Eisenkraft JB; Posner KL; Domino KB
    Anesthesiology; 2013 Oct; 119(4):788-95. PubMed ID: 23835591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Prolonged national economic effects following patient injuries in Swedish health care. The single injury is expensive, but the total number of injuries is relatively low].
    Persson U; Svensson M
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Oct 17-23; 102(42):3020-2, 3024-5. PubMed ID: 16294524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Large and small maternity units.
    Cudby HE
    Midwives Chron; 1978 Feb; 91(1081):37. PubMed ID: 245542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.