These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24266593)

  • 1. Applications of propensity score methods in observational comparative effectiveness and safety research: where have we come and where should we go?
    Borah BJ; Moriarty JP; Crown WH; Doshi JA
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Jan; 3(1):63-78. PubMed ID: 24266593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regulatory considerations in the design of comparative observational studies using propensity scores.
    Yue LQ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1272-9. PubMed ID: 23075022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the comparative effectiveness of newly marketed medications: methodological challenges and implications for drug development.
    Schneeweiss S; Gagne JJ; Glynn RJ; Ruhl M; Rassen JA
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Dec; 90(6):777-90. PubMed ID: 22048230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Propensity score models in observational comparative effectiveness studies: cornerstone of design or statistical afterthought?
    Robinson JW
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Mar; 1(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 24237373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating methodological assumptions in comparative effectiveness research: overcoming pitfalls.
    Alemayehu D; Cappelleri JC
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Jan; 3(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 24345258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The methods of comparative effectiveness research.
    Sox HC; Goodman SN
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Approaches to answering critical CER questions.
    Kinnier CV; Chung JW; Bilimoria KY
    Cancer Treat Res; 2015; 164():1-14. PubMed ID: 25677015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performing both propensity score and instrumental variable analyses in observational studies often leads to discrepant results: a systematic review.
    Laborde-Castérot H; Agrinier N; Thilly N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 68(10):1232-40. PubMed ID: 26026496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Observational methods in comparative effectiveness research.
    Concato J; Lawler EV; Lew RA; Gaziano JM; Aslan M; Huang GD
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e16-23. PubMed ID: 21184862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An overview of methods for comparative effectiveness research.
    Meyer AM; Wheeler SB; Weinberger M; Chen RC; Carpenter WR
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24314337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.
    Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of observational investigations in comparative effectiveness research.
    Marko NF; Weil RJ
    Value Health; 2010 Dec; 13(8):989-97. PubMed ID: 21138497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perioperative comparative effectiveness research.
    Memtsoudis SG; Besculides MC
    Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 25(4):535-47. PubMed ID: 22099919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre-study feasibility and identifying sensitivity analyses for protocol pre-specification in comparative effectiveness research.
    Girman CJ; Faries D; Ryan P; Rotelli M; Belger M; Binkowitz B; O'Neill R;
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 May; 3(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 24969153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using comparative effectiveness research to remedy health disparities.
    Kupersmith J; LaBarca D
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Mar; 3(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 24645691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
    Neely JG; Sharon JD; Graboyes EM; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Grindler DJ; Dassopoulos T;
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):804-12. PubMed ID: 24098005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right.
    Sox HC
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S7-8. PubMed ID: 20473202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Lies, damned lies ..." and observational studies in comparative effectiveness research.
    Albert RK
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Jun; 187(11):1173-7. PubMed ID: 23725614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Overview of design, implementation and analysis of comparative effectiveness research].
    Liao X; Xie YM; Tian F; Shen H
    Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 38(6):930-5. PubMed ID: 23717982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Confounder adjustment in observational comparative effectiveness researches: (2) statistical adjustment approaches for unmeasured confounders].
    Huang LL; Wei YY; Chen F
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 40(11):1450-1455. PubMed ID: 31838820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.