These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24266593)
1. Applications of propensity score methods in observational comparative effectiveness and safety research: where have we come and where should we go? Borah BJ; Moriarty JP; Crown WH; Doshi JA J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Jan; 3(1):63-78. PubMed ID: 24266593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Regulatory considerations in the design of comparative observational studies using propensity scores. Yue LQ J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1272-9. PubMed ID: 23075022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the comparative effectiveness of newly marketed medications: methodological challenges and implications for drug development. Schneeweiss S; Gagne JJ; Glynn RJ; Ruhl M; Rassen JA Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Dec; 90(6):777-90. PubMed ID: 22048230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The methods of comparative effectiveness research. Sox HC; Goodman SN Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Approaches to answering critical CER questions. Kinnier CV; Chung JW; Bilimoria KY Cancer Treat Res; 2015; 164():1-14. PubMed ID: 25677015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performing both propensity score and instrumental variable analyses in observational studies often leads to discrepant results: a systematic review. Laborde-Castérot H; Agrinier N; Thilly N J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 68(10):1232-40. PubMed ID: 26026496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Observational methods in comparative effectiveness research. Concato J; Lawler EV; Lew RA; Gaziano JM; Aslan M; Huang GD Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e16-23. PubMed ID: 21184862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An overview of methods for comparative effectiveness research. Meyer AM; Wheeler SB; Weinberger M; Chen RC; Carpenter WR Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24314337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions. Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of observational investigations in comparative effectiveness research. Marko NF; Weil RJ Value Health; 2010 Dec; 13(8):989-97. PubMed ID: 21138497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative comparative effectiveness research. Memtsoudis SG; Besculides MC Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 25(4):535-47. PubMed ID: 22099919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pre-study feasibility and identifying sensitivity analyses for protocol pre-specification in comparative effectiveness research. Girman CJ; Faries D; Ryan P; Rotelli M; Belger M; Binkowitz B; O'Neill R; J Comp Eff Res; 2014 May; 3(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 24969153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using comparative effectiveness research to remedy health disparities. Kupersmith J; LaBarca D J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Mar; 3(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 24645691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]