These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24266885)

  • 1. VarBin, a novel method for classifying true and false positive variants in NGS data.
    Durtschi J; Margraf RL; Coonrod EM; Mallempati KC; Voelkerding KV
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 13(Suppl 13):S2. PubMed ID: 24266885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rare variant detection using family-based sequencing analysis.
    Peng G; Fan Y; Palculict TB; Shen P; Ruteshouser EC; Chi AK; Davis RW; Huff V; Scharfe C; Wang W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Mar; 110(10):3985-90. PubMed ID: 23426633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calling known variants and identifying new variants while rapidly aligning sequence data.
    VanRaden PM; Bickhart DM; O'Connell JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3216-3229. PubMed ID: 30772032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. tarSVM: Improving the accuracy of variant calls derived from microfluidic PCR-based targeted next generation sequencing using a support vector machine.
    Gillies CE; Otto EA; Vega-Warner V; Robertson CC; Sanna-Cherchi S; Gharavi A; Crawford B; Bhimma R; Winkler C; ; ; Kang HM; Sampson MG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 17(1):233. PubMed ID: 27287006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of exome variants using the Ion Proton Platform to sequence error-prone regions.
    Seo H; Park Y; Min BJ; Seo ME; Kim JH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181304. PubMed ID: 28742110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison and evaluation of two exome capture kits and sequencing platforms for variant calling.
    Zhang G; Wang J; Yang J; Li W; Deng Y; Li J; Huang J; Hu S; Zhang B
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Aug; 16(1):581. PubMed ID: 26242175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance comparison: exome sequencing as a single test replacing Sanger sequencing.
    Fridman H; Bormans C; Einhorn M; Au D; Bormans A; Porat Y; Sanchez LF; Manning B; Levy-Lahad E; Behar DM
    Mol Genet Genomics; 2021 May; 296(3):653-663. PubMed ID: 33694043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation and assessment of variant calling pipelines for next-generation sequencing.
    Pirooznia M; Kramer M; Parla J; Goes FS; Potash JB; McCombie WR; Zandi PP
    Hum Genomics; 2014 Jul; 8(1):14. PubMed ID: 25078893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PhredEM: a phred-score-informed genotype-calling approach for next-generation sequencing studies.
    Liao P; Satten GA; Hu YJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 41(5):375-387. PubMed ID: 28560825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. BAYSIC: a Bayesian method for combining sets of genome variants with improved specificity and sensitivity.
    Cantarel BL; Weaver D; McNeill N; Zhang J; Mackey AJ; Reese J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 15():104. PubMed ID: 24725768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consensus Genotyper for Exome Sequencing (CGES): improving the quality of exome variant genotypes.
    Trubetskoy V; Rodriguez A; Dave U; Campbell N; Crawford EL; Cook EH; Sutcliffe JS; Foster I; Madduri R; Cox NJ; Davis LK
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 25270638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A machine learning model to determine the accuracy of variant calls in capture-based next generation sequencing.
    van den Akker J; Mishne G; Zimmer AD; Zhou AY
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):263. PubMed ID: 29665779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic Evaluation of Sanger Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing Variants.
    Beck TF; Mullikin JC; ; Biesecker LG
    Clin Chem; 2016 Apr; 62(4):647-54. PubMed ID: 26847218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of an evidence-based algorithm that optimizes sensitivity and specificity in ES-based diagnostics of a clinically heterogeneous patient population.
    Bauer P; Kandaswamy KK; Weiss MER; Paknia O; Werber M; Bertoli-Avella AM; Yüksel Z; Bochinska M; Oprea GE; Kishore S; Weckesser V; Karges E; Rolfs A
    Genet Med; 2019 Jan; 21(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 30100613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.
    Hofmann AL; Behr J; Singer J; Kuipers J; Beisel C; Schraml P; Moch H; Beerenwinkel N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28049408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relevance of next generation sequencing (NGS) data re-analysis in the diagnosis of monogenic diseases leading to organ failure.
    Saglia C; Bracciamà V; Trotta L; Mioli F; Faini AC; Brach Del Prever GM; Kalantari S; Luca M; Romeo CM; Scolari C; Peruzzi L; Calvo PL; Mussa A; Fenoglio R; Roccatello D; Alberti C; Carli D; Amoroso A; Deaglio S; Vaisitti T
    BMC Med Genomics; 2023 Nov; 16(1):303. PubMed ID: 38012624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using genotype array data to compare multi- and single-sample variant calls and improve variant call sets from deep coverage whole-genome sequencing data.
    Shringarpure SS; Mathias RA; Hernandez RD; O'Connor TD; Szpiech ZA; Torres R; De La Vega FM; Bustamante CD; Barnes KC; Taub MA;
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(8):1147-1153. PubMed ID: 28035032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GATK hard filtering: tunable parameters to improve variant calling for next generation sequencing targeted gene panel data.
    De Summa S; Malerba G; Pinto R; Mori A; Mijatovic V; Tommasi S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 5):119. PubMed ID: 28361668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recurrent miscalling of missense variation from short-read genome sequence data.
    Field MA; Burgio G; Chuah A; Al Shekaili J; Hassan B; Al Sukaiti N; Foote SJ; Cook MC; Andrews TD
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Jul; 20(Suppl 8):546. PubMed ID: 31307400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ViVaMBC: estimating viral sequence variation in complex populations from illumina deep-sequencing data using model-based clustering.
    Verbist B; Clement L; Reumers J; Thys K; Vapirev A; Talloen W; Wetzels Y; Meys J; Aerssens J; Bijnens L; Thas O
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16():59. PubMed ID: 25887734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.