These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24267107)

  • 1. Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
    Harty NJ; Kozinn SI; Canes D; Sorcini A; Moinzadeh A
    Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):639-46; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 24267107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Bolenz C; Gupta A; Hotze T; Ho R; Cadeddu JA; Roehrborn CG; Lotan Y
    Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 19931979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Schroeck FR; Sun L; Freedland SJ; Albala DM; Mouraviev V; Polascik TJ; Moul JW
    BJU Int; 2008 Jul; 102(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 18384634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients.
    Laurila TA; Huang W; Jarrard DF
    Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 18640061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].
    Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A
    Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
    Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
    Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the rate, location and size of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Kasraeian A; Barret E; Chan J; Sanchez-Salas R; Validire P; Cathelineau X; Rozet F; Galiano M; Vallancien G
    BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(7):1174-8. PubMed ID: 21392221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program?
    White MA; De Haan AP; Stephens DD; Maatman TK; Maatman TJ
    Urology; 2009 Mar; 73(3):567-71. PubMed ID: 19167036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk-adjusted analysis of positive surgical margins following laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Touijer K; Kuroiwa K; Eastham JA; Vickers A; Reuter VE; Scardino PT; Guillonneau B
    Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1090-6. PubMed ID: 17188801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD
    Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of 90-day re-admission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).
    Chung SD; Kelle JJ; Huang CY; Chen YH; Lin HC
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E966-71. PubMed ID: 22540425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
    Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years.
    Doumerc N; Yuen C; Savdie R; Rahman MB; Rasiah KK; Pe Benito R; Delprado W; Matthews J; Haynes AM; Stricker PD
    BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20067454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pathologic outcome of laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy.
    Dahl DM; He W; Lazarus R; McDougal WS; Wu CL
    Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1253-6. PubMed ID: 17141845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.
    Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Sun L; Robertson CN; Walther P; Albala D; Moul JW; Polascik TJ
    Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 17320670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate: robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy in a matched-pair analysis.
    Martinschek A; Heinzelmann K; Ritter M; Heinrich E; Trojan L
    J Endourol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 22489895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Location of positive surgical margin and its association with biochemical recurrence rate do not differ significantly in four different types of radical prostatectomy.
    Suh YS; Jang HJ; Song W; Lee HW; Kim HS; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Lee HM
    Korean J Urol; 2014 Dec; 55(12):802-7. PubMed ID: 25512814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive surgical margins and early oncological outcomes of robotic vs open radical prostatectomy at a medium case-load institution.
    Antonelli A; Sodano M; Peroni A; Mittino I; Palumbo C; Furlan M; Carobbio F; Tardanico R; Fisogni S; Simeone C
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Feb; 69(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 28009146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.