441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24267107)
1. Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Harty NJ; Kozinn SI; Canes D; Sorcini A; Moinzadeh A
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):639-46; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 24267107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Bolenz C; Gupta A; Hotze T; Ho R; Cadeddu JA; Roehrborn CG; Lotan Y
Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 19931979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Schroeck FR; Sun L; Freedland SJ; Albala DM; Mouraviev V; Polascik TJ; Moul JW
BJU Int; 2008 Jul; 102(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 18384634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients.
Laurila TA; Huang W; Jarrard DF
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 18640061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].
Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A
Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the rate, location and size of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Kasraeian A; Barret E; Chan J; Sanchez-Salas R; Validire P; Cathelineau X; Rozet F; Galiano M; Vallancien G
BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(7):1174-8. PubMed ID: 21392221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program?
White MA; De Haan AP; Stephens DD; Maatman TK; Maatman TJ
Urology; 2009 Mar; 73(3):567-71. PubMed ID: 19167036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk-adjusted analysis of positive surgical margins following laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Touijer K; Kuroiwa K; Eastham JA; Vickers A; Reuter VE; Scardino PT; Guillonneau B
Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1090-6. PubMed ID: 17188801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD
Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 90-day re-admission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).
Chung SD; Kelle JJ; Huang CY; Chen YH; Lin HC
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E966-71. PubMed ID: 22540425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years.
Doumerc N; Yuen C; Savdie R; Rahman MB; Rasiah KK; Pe Benito R; Delprado W; Matthews J; Haynes AM; Stricker PD
BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20067454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pathologic outcome of laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy.
Dahl DM; He W; Lazarus R; McDougal WS; Wu CL
Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1253-6. PubMed ID: 17141845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.
Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Sun L; Robertson CN; Walther P; Albala D; Moul JW; Polascik TJ
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 17320670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate: robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy in a matched-pair analysis.
Martinschek A; Heinzelmann K; Ritter M; Heinrich E; Trojan L
J Endourol; 2012 Sep; 26(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 22489895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Location of positive surgical margin and its association with biochemical recurrence rate do not differ significantly in four different types of radical prostatectomy.
Suh YS; Jang HJ; Song W; Lee HW; Kim HS; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Lee HM
Korean J Urol; 2014 Dec; 55(12):802-7. PubMed ID: 25512814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positive surgical margins and early oncological outcomes of robotic vs open radical prostatectomy at a medium case-load institution.
Antonelli A; Sodano M; Peroni A; Mittino I; Palumbo C; Furlan M; Carobbio F; Tardanico R; Fisogni S; Simeone C
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Feb; 69(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 28009146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
