These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24267527)

  • 1. In vitro evaluation of the insertion force for different dilator tip configurations.
    Ballard DH; Orchard MA; Williams JT; Lokitz SJ; Do DV; D'Agostino HB
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Dec; 24(12):1906-9. PubMed ID: 24267527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ureteral access sheaths: a comprehensive comparison of physical and mechanical properties.
    Patel N; Monga M
    Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(3):524-535. PubMed ID: 29493185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals.
    Kim HC; Kim HJ; Lee CJ; Kim BM; Park JK; Versluis A
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):593-602. PubMed ID: 19467053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New ureteral access sheaths: a double standard.
    De S; Sarkissian C; Torricelli FC; Brown R; Monga M
    Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):757-63. PubMed ID: 25661780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro study of needle force penetration comparing a standard linear insertion to the new bidirectional rotation insertion technique.
    Hochman MN; Friedman MJ
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(10):789-96. PubMed ID: 11820047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hydrophilic guidewires: evaluation and comparison of their properties and safety.
    Torricelli FC; De S; Sarkissian C; Monga M
    Urology; 2013 Nov; 82(5):1182-6. PubMed ID: 23992968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro investigation of the effect of bevel design on the penetration and withdrawal forces of dental needles.
    Steele AC; German MJ; Haas J; Lambert G; Meechan JG
    J Dent; 2013 Feb; 41(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 23137996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insertion of microneedles into skin: measurement and prediction of insertion force and needle fracture force.
    Davis SP; Landis BJ; Adams ZH; Allen MG; Prausnitz MR
    J Biomech; 2004 Aug; 37(8):1155-63. PubMed ID: 15212920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new oesophageal dilator.
    Procter DS
    S Afr J Surg; 1994 Jun; 32(2):62-6. PubMed ID: 7502174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Less leakage and dislodgement with a catheter-over-needle versus a catheter-through-needle approach for peripheral nerve block: an ex vivo study.
    Tsui BC; Tsui J
    Can J Anaesth; 2012 Jul; 59(7):655-61. PubMed ID: 22565332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic evaluation of ureteral occlusion devices: insertion, deployment, stone migration, and extraction.
    Ahmed M; Pedro RN; Kieley S; Akornor JW; Durfee WK; Monga M
    Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):976-80. PubMed ID: 19394493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in penetration force of intravenous catheters: effect of grinding methods on inner needles of intravenous catheters.
    Suzuki T; Tanaka A; Fukuyama H; Nishiyama J; Kanazawa M; Oda M; Takahashi M
    Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 2004 Dec; 29(4):175-81. PubMed ID: 15717489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of five different abdominal access trocar systems: analysis of insertion force, removal force, and defect size.
    Shafer DM; Khajanchee Y; Wong J; Swanström LL
    Surg Innov; 2006 Sep; 13(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 17056783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rhinomanometric evaluation of the improved mechanical therapeutic nasal dilator in patients with anterior nasal obstruction.
    Chaudhry MR; Akhtar S; Dwalsaint F
    Rhinology; 1996 Mar; 34(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8739866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentin removal efficacy over time of the Buc-1 ultrasonic tip.
    Lawlor K; Yelton C; Kulild J; Walker MP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e107-9. PubMed ID: 20416514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasonic dilatation of the uterine cervix: morphologic evaluation of a new device in the sow.
    Ackman CF; Shennib HA; Ferenczy A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 62(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 6866367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Insertion distance of neonatal intercostal catheters using a 10 French Argyle trocar thoracic catheter.
    Davies MW; Dunster KR
    Crit Care Resusc; 2003 Jun; 5(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 16573467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study of parameters for evaluating the pushability of interventional devices using box-shaped blood vessel biomodels made of PVA-H or silicone.
    Yu CH; Ohta M; Kwon TK
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(1):961-8. PubMed ID: 24211985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Split 24-F Amplatz dilator for percutaneous extraction of an intravascular bullet: case report and technical note.
    Gaylord GM; Johnsrude IS
    Radiology; 1989 Mar; 170(3 Pt 1):888-9. PubMed ID: 2644664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of dilators for central venous catheterization using an experimental model.
    Takahashi T; Morita M; Shimada Y
    J Anesth; 2005; 19(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 15875130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.