These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24268059)

  • 1. Valuing flexibilities in the design of urban water management systems.
    Deng Y; Cardin MA; Babovic V; Santhanakrishnan D; Schmitter P; Meshgi A
    Water Res; 2013 Dec; 47(20):7162-74. PubMed ID: 24268059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A decision support tool for sustainable planning of urban water systems: presenting the Dynamic Urban Water Simulation Model.
    Willuweit L; O'Sullivan JJ
    Water Res; 2013 Dec; 47(20):7206-20. PubMed ID: 24183560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of low impact development on urban flooding under different rainfall characteristics.
    Qin HP; Li ZX; Fu G
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():577-85. PubMed ID: 24029461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Receiving water quality assessment: comparison between simplified and detailed integrated urban modelling approaches.
    Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(10):2301-12. PubMed ID: 21076216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The management of urban surface water flood risks: SUDS performance in flood reduction from extreme events.
    Viavattene C; Ellis JB
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 23128626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An index-based robust decision making framework for watershed management in a changing climate.
    Kim Y; Chung ES
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 473-474():88-102. PubMed ID: 24365586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrated assessment of policy interventions for promoting sustainable irrigation in semi-arid environments: a hydro-economic modeling approach.
    Blanco-Gutiérrez I; Varela-Ortega C; Purkey DR
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():144-60. PubMed ID: 23732193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Towards sustainable urban water management: a critical reassessment.
    Marlow DR; Moglia M; Cook S; Beale DJ
    Water Res; 2013 Dec; 47(20):7150-61. PubMed ID: 24210506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developing the evidence base for mainstreaming adaptation of stormwater systems to climate change.
    Gersonius B; Nasruddin F; Ashley R; Jeuken A; Pathirana A; Zevenbergen C
    Water Res; 2012 Dec; 46(20):6824-35. PubMed ID: 22575154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multi-objective optimisation approach to water management.
    Xevi E; Khan S
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Dec; 77(4):269-77. PubMed ID: 16288827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sustainable urban development in Brisbane City--the Holy Grail?
    Rahman K; Weber T
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):73-9. PubMed ID: 12793664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Operationalising uncertainty in data and models for integrated water resources management.
    Blind MW; Refsgaard JC
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(9):1-12. PubMed ID: 18025725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrated assessments of green infrastructure for flood mitigation to support robust decision-making for sponge city construction in an urbanized watershed.
    Mei C; Liu J; Wang H; Yang Z; Ding X; Shao W
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Oct; 639():1394-1407. PubMed ID: 29929303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application.
    Birol E; Karousakis K; Koundouri P
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Jul; 365(1-3):105-22. PubMed ID: 16647102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Synthesized trade-off analysis of flood control solutions under future deep uncertainty: An application to the central business district of Shanghai.
    Hu H; Tian Z; Sun L; Wen J; Liang Z; Dong G; Liu J
    Water Res; 2019 Dec; 166():115067. PubMed ID: 31522014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrated urban water planning: big picture planning is good for the wallet and the environment.
    Anderson J; Iyaduri R
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):19-23. PubMed ID: 12793657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Designing cost effective water demand management programs in Australia.
    White SB; Fane SA
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(6-7):225-32. PubMed ID: 12380995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the service performance of drainage system and transformation of pipeline network based on urban combined sewer system model.
    Peng HQ; Liu Y; Wang HW; Ma LM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Oct; 22(20):15712-21. PubMed ID: 26022395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal expansion of a drinking water infrastructure system with respect to carbon footprint, cost-effectiveness and water demand.
    Chang NB; Qi C; Yang YJ
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 110():194-206. PubMed ID: 22789655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utilising integrated urban water management to assess the viability of decentralised water solutions.
    Burn S; Maheepala S; Sharma A
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 22678207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.