These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
828 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24268114)
1. Rationale and design of the HeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: NeXt sTeps) study. Gaur S; Achenbach S; Leipsic J; Mauri L; Bezerra HG; Jensen JM; Bøtker HE; Lassen JF; Nørgaard BL J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(5):279-88. PubMed ID: 24268114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic AngiOgraphy) study. Min JK; Berman DS; Budoff MJ; Jaffer FA; Leipsic J; Leon MB; Mancini GB; Mauri L; Schwartz RS; Shaw LJ J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2011; 5(5):301-9. PubMed ID: 21930103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Ko BS; Linde JJ; Ihdayhid AR; Norgaard BL; Kofoed KF; Sørgaard M; Adams D; Crossett M; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 31273632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard. Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve. Yoon YE; Choi JH; Kim JH; Park KW; Doh JH; Kim YJ; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Gwon HC; Choe YH; Choi DJ; Kim HS; Oh BH; Park YB JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1088-96. PubMed ID: 23153908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). Nørgaard BL; Leipsic J; Gaur S; Seneviratne S; Ko BS; Ito H; Jensen JM; Mauri L; De Bruyne B; Bezerra H; Osawa K; Marwan M; Naber C; Erglis A; Park SJ; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Lassen JF; Bøtker HE; Achenbach S; J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 63(12):1145-1155. PubMed ID: 24486266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Performance of Transluminal Attenuation Gradient and Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from 320-Detector Row CT Angiography to Diagnose Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Stenosis: An NXT Substudy. Ko BS; Wong DT; Nørgaard BL; Leong DP; Cameron JD; Gaur S; Marwan M; Achenbach S; Kuribayashi S; Kimura T; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 26444662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coronary CT angiography derived fractional flow reserve: Methodology and evaluation of a point of care algorithm. Coenen A; Lubbers MM; Kurata A; Kono A; Dedic A; Chelu RG; Dijkshoorn ML; van Geuns RJ; Schoebinger M; Itu L; Sharma P; Nieman K J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 26747231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of Coronary Calcification on the Diagnostic Performance of CT Angiography Derived FFR in Coronary Artery Disease: A Substudy of the NXT Trial. Nørgaard BL; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Ito H; Miyoshi T; Park SJ; Zvaigzne L; Tzemos N; Jensen JM; Hansson N; Ko B; Bezerra H; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Lassen JF; Bøtker HE; Achenbach S JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 8(9):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 26298072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rationale and design of the PERFECTION (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography PERfusion versus Fractional flow rEserve measured by Computed Tomography angiography In the evaluation of suspected cOroNary artery disease) prospective study. Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Mushtaq S; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Trabattoni D; Ferrari C; Calligaris G; Teruzzi G; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 27050025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy and discrimination of ischemia by fractional flow reserve CT using a clinical use rule: results from the Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic Angiography study. Thompson AG; Raju R; Blanke P; Yang TH; Mancini GB; Budoff MJ; Norgaard BL; Min JK; Leipsic JA J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 25819194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Machine-Learning Approach to Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve: Result From the MACHINE Consortium. Coenen A; Kim YH; Kruk M; Tesche C; De Geer J; Kurata A; Lubbers ML; Daemen J; Itu L; Rapaka S; Sharma P; Schwemmer C; Persson A; Schoepf UJ; Kepka C; Hyun Yang D; Nieman K Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jun; 11(6):e007217. PubMed ID: 29914866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of FFR-derived from CT and stress perfusion CMR with invasive FFR in intermediate-grade coronary artery stenosis. Ghekiere O; Bielen J; Leipsic J; Dewilde W; Mancini I; Hansen D; Dendale P; Nchimi A Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 35(3):559-568. PubMed ID: 30284138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial. Lu MT; Ferencik M; Roberts RS; Lee KL; Ivanov A; Adami E; Mark DB; Jaffer FA; Leipsic JA; Douglas PS; Hoffmann U JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1350-1358. PubMed ID: 28412436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice. Kawaji T; Shiomi H; Morishita H; Morimoto T; Taylor CA; Kanao S; Koizumi K; Kozawa S; Morihiro K; Watanabe H; Tazaki J; Imai M; Saito N; Shizuta S; Ono K; Togashi K; Kimura T Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 27718139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rationale, design and goals of the HeartFlow assessing diagnostic value of non-invasive FFR Chinnaiyan KM; Akasaka T; Amano T; Bax JJ; Blanke P; De Bruyne B; Kawasaki T; Leipsic J; Matsuo H; Morino Y; Nieman K; Norgaard BL; Patel MR; Pontone G; Rabbat M; Rogers C; Sand NP; Raff G J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 28017291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]