These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24268798)

  • 1. Biomechanical determinants of the stability of dental implants: influence of the bone-implant interface properties.
    Mathieu V; Vayron R; Richard G; Lambert G; Naili S; Meningaud JP; Haiat G
    J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 24268798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of biomechanical properties of the bone-implant interface on dental implant stability: from in silico approaches to the patient's mouth.
    Haïat G; Wang HL; Brunski J
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2014 Jul; 16():187-213. PubMed ID: 24905878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface.
    Brunski JB
    Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():99-119. PubMed ID: 11276755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of the biomechanical stability of a dental implant with quantitative ultrasound: A three-dimensional finite element study.
    Vayron R; Nguyen VH; Bosc R; Naili S; Haïat G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):773-80. PubMed ID: 26936559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success.
    Steigenga JT; al-Shammari KF; Nociti FH; Misch CE; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2003; 12(4):306-17. PubMed ID: 14752967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
    Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.
    Gao X; Fraulob M; Haïat G
    J R Soc Interface; 2019 Jul; 16(156):20190259. PubMed ID: 31362615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions.
    Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant surface material, design, and osseointegration.
    Ogle OE
    Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Apr; 59(2):505-20. PubMed ID: 25835806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biological and biomechanical evaluation of bone remodelling and implant stability after using an osteotome technique.
    Büchter A; Kleinheinz J; Wiesmann HP; Kersken J; Nienkemper M; Weyhrother Hv; Joos U; Meyer U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15642025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Partially Biodegradable Distraction Implant to Replace Conventional Implants in Alveolar Bone of Insufficient Height: A Preliminary Study in Dogs.
    Li T; Zhang Y; Shao B; Gao Y; Zhang C; Cao Q; Kong L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1164-73. PubMed ID: 24888978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of three different apical implant designs at stability and osseointegration process: experimental study in rabbits.
    Gehrke SA; Pérez-Albacete Martínez C; Piattelli A; Shibli JA; Markovic A; Calvo Guirado JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Mar; 28(3):355-361. PubMed ID: 26925570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of local cancellous bone amelioration by poly-L-DL-lactide copolymers to improve primary stability of dental implants: a biomechanical study in sheep.
    Stübinger S; Waser J; Hefti T; Drechsler A; Sidler M; Klein K; von Rechenberg B; Schlottig F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 May; 26(5):572-80. PubMed ID: 24989873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study.
    Orsini E; Giavaresi G; Trirè A; Ottani V; Salgarello S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 22442779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immediate function of cortically anchored disk-design implants without bone augmentation in moderately to severely resorbed completely edentulous maxillae.
    Scortecci G
    J Oral Implantol; 1999; 25(2):70-9. PubMed ID: 10551141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomaterial and biomechanical considerations to prevent risks in implant therapy.
    Bonfante EA; Jimbo R; Witek L; Tovar N; Neiva R; Torroni A; Coelho PG
    Periodontol 2000; 2019 Oct; 81(1):139-151. PubMed ID: 31407440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of value of actual micromotion as a direct measure of implant micromobility after healing (secondary implant stability). An in vivo histologic and biomechanical study.
    Trisi P; Berardini M; Falco A; Podaliri Vulpiani M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1423-1430. PubMed ID: 26727557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Novel Experimental Dental Implant Permits Quantitative Grading of Surface-Property Effects on Osseointegration.
    Hunziker EB; Spiegl-Habegger M; Rudolf S; Liu Y; Gu Z; Lippuner K; Shintani N; Enggist L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):967-978. PubMed ID: 30231082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiscale analyses of the bone-implant interface.
    Cha JY; Pereira MD; Smith AA; Houschyar KS; Yin X; Mouraret S; Brunski JB; Helms JA
    J Dent Res; 2015 Mar; 94(3):482-90. PubMed ID: 25628271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface.
    Brunski JB
    Clin Mater; 1992; 10(3):153-201. PubMed ID: 10149982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.