BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24269219)

  • 1. The percentage of core involved by cancer is the best predictor of insignificant prostate cancer, according to an updated definition (tumor volume up to 2.5 cm3): analysis of a cohort of 210 consecutive patients with low-risk disease.
    Antonelli A; Vismara Fugini A; Tardanico R; Giovanessi L; Zambolin T; Simeone C
    Urology; 2014 Jan; 83(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 24269219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The contemporary concept of significant versus insignificant prostate cancer.
    Ploussard G; Epstein JI; Montironi R; Carroll PR; Wirth M; Grimm MO; Bjartell AS; Montorsi F; Freedland SJ; Erbersdobler A; van der Kwast TH
    Eur Urol; 2011 Aug; 60(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 21601982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
    Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between tumor volume and the number of positive cores in men undergoing multisite extended biopsy: implication for expectant management.
    Ochiai A; Troncoso P; Chen ME; Lloreta J; Babaian RJ
    J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2164-8, discussion 2168. PubMed ID: 16280756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined disease.
    Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H
    Int J Urol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 15828954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Poulos CK; Daggy JK; Cheng L
    Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 15274065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The number of cores taken in patients diagnosed with a single microfocus at initial biopsy is a major predictor of insignificant prostate cancer.
    Villa L; Capitanio U; Briganti A; Abdollah F; Suardi N; Salonia A; Gallina A; Freschi M; Russo A; Castiglione F; Bianchi M; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Scattoni V
    J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):854-9. PubMed ID: 23022004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preoperative parameters to predict tumor volume in Japanese patients with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
    Furuya Y; Fuse H; Nagakawa O; Masai M
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2002 Apr; 7(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 12018107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The independent impact of extended pattern biopsy on prostate cancer stage migration.
    Master VA; Chi T; Simko JP; Weinberg V; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1789-93; discussion 1793. PubMed ID: 16217288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade.
    Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
    Villamón-Fort R; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM; Soriano-Sarriá P; Ramos-Soler D; Pastor-Hernández F; Gil-Salom M
    Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 17495491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should intervening benign tissue be included in the measurement of discontinuous foci of cancer on prostate needle biopsy? Correlation with radical prostatectomy findings.
    Karram S; Trock BJ; Netto GJ; Epstein JI
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Sep; 35(9):1351-5. PubMed ID: 21836493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy features to predict "clinically insignificant" prostate cancer.
    Loeb S; Roehl KA; Thaxton CS; Catalona WJ
    Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18436287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
    Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen cannot reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis.
    Cupp MR; Bostwick DG; Myers RP; Oesterling JE
    J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1543-8. PubMed ID: 7714976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.
    Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA
    Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relating biopsy and clinical variables to radical prostatectomy findings: can insignificant and advanced prostate cancer be predicted in a screening population?
    Anast JW; Andriole GL; Bismar TA; Yan Y; Humphrey PA
    Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 15351590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.