365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24269627)
1. Comparative analysis of toxicological evaluations for dermal exposure performed under two different EU regulatory frameworks.
Westerholm E; Schenk L
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Feb; 68(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 24269627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does EU legislation allow the use of the Benchmark Dose (BMD) approach for risk assessment?
Brandon EF; Bulder AS; van Engelen JG; Mahieu CM; Mennes WC; Pronk ME; Rietveld AG; van de Ven BM; Ten Voorde SE; Wolterink G; Slob W; Zeilmaker MJ; Bessems JG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Nov; 67(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 23871753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proper knowledge on toxicokinetics improves human hazard testing and subsequent health risk characterisation. A case study approach.
Bessems JG; Geraets L
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 24051162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Derivation of safe health-based exposure limits for potential consumer exposure to styrene migrating into food from food containers.
Gelbke HP; Banton M; Faes E; Leibold E; Pemberton M; Duhayon S
Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Feb; 64():258-69. PubMed ID: 24316211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk assessment of local dermal effects and skin sensitisation under the EU Chemicals Regulation REACH: a proposal for a qualitative, exposure scenario specific, approach.
Schaafsma G; Hertsenberg AJ; Marquart J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Aug; 60(3):308-17. PubMed ID: 21545823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Final amended report on the safety assessment of Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben, and Benzylparaben as used in cosmetic products.
Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 4():1-82. PubMed ID: 19101832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Final report of the safety assessment of Alcohol Denat., including SD Alcohol 3-A, SD Alcohol 30, SD Alcohol 39, SD Alcohol 39-B, SD Alcohol 39-C, SD Alcohol 40, SD Alcohol 40-B, and SD Alcohol 40-C, and the denaturants, Quassin, Brucine Sulfate/Brucine, and Denatonium Benzoate.
Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel
Int J Toxicol; 2008; 27 Suppl 1():1-43. PubMed ID: 18569160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety assessment of personal care products/cosmetics and their ingredients.
Nohynek GJ; Antignac E; Re T; Toutain H
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 243(2):239-59. PubMed ID: 20005888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interpreting REACH guidance in the determination of the derived no effect level (DNEL).
Kreider ML; Spencer Williams E
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Nov; 58(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 20655351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of REACH-derived no-effect levels for workers with EU indicative occupational exposure limit values and national limit values in Finland.
Tynkkynen S; Santonen T; Stockmann-Juvala H
Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 25638729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk assessment of nanomaterials in cosmetics: a European union perspective.
Henkler F; Tralau T; Tentschert J; Kneuer C; Haase A; Platzek T; Luch A; Götz ME
Arch Toxicol; 2012 Nov; 86(11):1641-6. PubMed ID: 23052193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Principle considerations for the risk assessment of sprayed consumer products.
Steiling W; Bascompta M; Carthew P; Catalano G; Corea N; D'Haese A; Jackson P; Kromidas L; Meurice P; Rothe H; Singal M
Toxicol Lett; 2014 May; 227(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 24657525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Review of fullerene toxicity and exposure--appraisal of a human health risk assessment, based on open literature.
Aschberger K; Johnston HJ; Stone V; Aitken RJ; Tran CL; Hankin SM; Peters SA; Christensen FM
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3):455-73. PubMed ID: 20800639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Dermal Sensitisation Threshold- a TTC approach for allergic contact dermatitis.
Safford RJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 18406502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the safety of cosmetic chemicals: Consideration of a flux decision tree to predict dermally delivered systemic dose for comparison with oral TTC (Threshold of Toxicological Concern).
Williams FM; Rothe H; Barrett G; Chiodini A; Whyte J; Cronin MT; Monteiro-Riviere NA; Plautz J; Roper C; Westerhout J; Yang C; Guy RH
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Apr; 76():174-86. PubMed ID: 26825378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Regulatory decision-making under uncertainty: are costs proportionate to benefits when restricting dangerous chemicals on European markets?
Brouwer R; Cauchi J; Verhoeven J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Apr; 68(3):438-46. PubMed ID: 24518386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in European legislation make it timely to introduce a transparent market surveillance system for cosmetics.
Lodén M; Ungerth L; Serup J
Acta Derm Venereol; 2007; 87(6):485-92. PubMed ID: 17989885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PBT assessment using the revised annex XIII of REACH: a comparison with other regulatory frameworks.
Moermond CT; Janssen MP; de Knecht JA; Montforts MH; Peijnenburg WJ; Zweers PG; Sijm DT
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 22006646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety assessment of a novel active ingredient, acetyl aspartic acid, according to the EU Cosmetics Regulation and the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety guidelines.
Daly P; Moran G
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2015 Oct; 37 Suppl 1():21-7. PubMed ID: 26114401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
