377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24269902)
21. Quantitative determination of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 mRNA in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue--a new option for predictive biomarker assessment in breast cancer.
Müller BM; Kronenwett R; Hennig G; Euting H; Weber K; Bohmann K; Weichert W; Altmann G; Roth C; Winzer KJ; Kristiansen G; Petry C; Dietel M; Denkert C
Diagn Mol Pathol; 2011 Mar; 20(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21326033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Discordances in ER, PR and HER2 receptors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
van de Ven S; Smit VT; Dekker TJ; Nortier JW; Kroep JR
Cancer Treat Rev; 2011 Oct; 37(6):422-30. PubMed ID: 21177040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Folate Receptor Alpha Immunohistochemistry in Cytology Specimens of Metastatic Breast Carcinoma.
Sheikh UN; Cohen C; Siddiqui MT
Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 26413911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Gene expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and microtubule-associated protein Tau in high-risk early breast cancer: a quest for molecular predictors of treatment benefit in the context of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group trial.
Pentheroudakis G; Kalogeras KT; Wirtz RM; Grimani I; Zografos G; Gogas H; Stropp U; Pectasides D; Skarlos D; Hennig G; Samantas E; Bafaloukos D; Papakostas P; Kalofonos HP; Pavlidis N; Fountzilas G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Jul; 116(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 18668363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Changes in ER, PR and HER2 receptors status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
Yang YF; Liao YY; Li LQ; Xie SR; Xie YF; Peng NF
Pathol Res Pract; 2013 Dec; 209(12):797-802. PubMed ID: 24183366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Triple-negative phenotype is of adverse prognostic value in patients treated with dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy: a translational research analysis in the context of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) randomized phase III trial.
Skarlos P; Christodoulou C; Kalogeras KT; Eleftheraki AG; Bobos M; Batistatou A; Valavanis C; Tzaida O; Timotheadou E; Kronenwett R; Wirtz RM; Kostopoulos I; Televantou D; Koutselini E; Papaspirou I; Papadimitriou CA; Pectasides D; Gogas H; Aravantinos G; Pavlidis N; Arapantoni P; Skarlos DV; Fountzilas G
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2012 Feb; 69(2):533-46. PubMed ID: 21901395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ HER2- breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics.
Lips EH; Mulder L; de Ronde JJ; Mandjes IA; Vincent A; Vrancken Peeters MT; Nederlof PM; Wesseling J; Rodenhuis S
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 131(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 21472434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR for assessing ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 and evaluating subtypes in patients with breast cancer.
Chen L; Chen Y; Xie Z; Luo J; Wang Y; Zhou J; Huang L; Li H; Wang L; Liu P; Shu M; Zhang W; Ke Z
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Aug; 194(3):517-529. PubMed ID: 35789315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Coordinated expression of ER, PR and HER2 define different prognostic subtypes among poorly differentiated breast carcinomas.
Fernandes RC; Bevilacqua JL; Soares IC; Siqueira SA; Pires L; Hegg R; Carvalho FM
Histopathology; 2009 Sep; 55(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 19723150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of prolonged fixation on the immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 expression in invasive breast cancer: a prospective study.
Tong LC; Nelson N; Tsourigiannis J; Mulligan AM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Apr; 35(4):545-52. PubMed ID: 21358301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Availability of fine needle aspirates for the assessment of HER2 gene amplification in invasive breast cancer patients].
Lee JW; Noh WC; Kim MS; Kim HA; Chang YH; Hong YJ; Hong SI; Lee JK
Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Oct; 28(5):392-9. PubMed ID: 18971621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Estrogen and progesterone hormone receptor status in breast carcinoma: comparison of immunocytochemistry and immunohistochemistry.
Radhika K; Prayaga AK
Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(2):148-50. PubMed ID: 20448377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparing breast biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry and FISH studies and Oncotype DX testing, a study of 610 cases.
Neely C; You S; Mendoza PM; Aneja R; Sahin AA; Li X
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):889-893. PubMed ID: 30230095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Characterization of breast cancer subtypes by quantitative assessment of biological parameters: relationship with clinicopathological characteristics, biological features and prognosis.
Del Casar JM; Martín A; García C; Corte MD; Alvarez A; Junquera S; González LO; Bongera M; García-Muñiz JL; Allende MT; Vizoso F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Dec; 141(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 18768247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Gene expression profiles of breast cancer obtained from core cut biopsies before neoadjuvant docetaxel, adriamycin, and cyclophoshamide chemotherapy correlate with routine prognostic markers and could be used to identify predictive signatures.
Rody A; Karn T; Gätje R; Kourtis K; Minckwitz G; Loibl S; Munnes M; Ruckhäberle E; Holtrich U; Kaufmann M; Ahr A
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2006 Apr; 128(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 16673249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. HER2 status in hormone receptor positive premenopausal primary breast cancer adds prognostic, but not tamoxifen treatment predictive, information.
Rydén L; Landberg G; Stål O; Nordenskjöld B; Fernö M; Bendahl PO
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 May; 109(2):351-7. PubMed ID: 17636399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of changes of biologic markers ER, PR, HER 2 and Ki-67 in breast cancer with administration of neoadjuvant dose-dense doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel.
Dede DS; Gumuskaya B; Guler G; Onat D; Altundag K; Ozisik Y
J BUON; 2013; 18(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 23613389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) of prognostic value once HER2-positive and. low-ER expression patients are removed?
Milburn M; Rosman M; Mylander C; Tafra L
Breast J; 2013; 19(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 23701403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An international study comparing conventional versus mRNA level testing (TargetPrint) for ER, PR, and HER2 status of breast cancer.
Wesseling J; Tinterri C; Sapino A; Zanconati F; Lutke-Holzik M; Nguyen B; Deck KB; Querzoli P; Perin T; Giardina C; Seitz G; Guinebretière JM; Barone J; Dekker L; de Snoo F; Stork-Sloots L; Roepman P; Watanabe T; Cusumano P
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 27377889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Tumor marker phenotype concordance in second primary breast cancer, California, 1999-2004.
Brown M; Bauer K; Pare M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Feb; 120(1):217-27. PubMed ID: 19629680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
