These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24270463)

  • 1. The ultra-rare-item effect: visual search for exceedingly rare items is highly susceptible to error.
    Mitroff SR; Biggs AT
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):284-9. PubMed ID: 24270463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A little bit of history repeating: Splitting up multiple-target visual searches decreases second-target miss errors.
    Cain MS; Biggs AT; Darling EF; Mitroff SR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Jun; 20(2):112-25. PubMed ID: 24708353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition.
    Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Memory for found targets interferes with subsequent performance in multiple-target visual search.
    Cain MS; Mitroff SR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1398-408. PubMed ID: 23163788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional guidance by working memory overrides salience cues in visual search.
    Dowd EW; Mitroff SR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1786-96. PubMed ID: 23565744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Context matters: the structure of task goals affects accuracy in multiple-target visual search.
    Clark K; Cain MS; Adcock RA; Mitroff SR
    Appl Ergon; 2014 May; 45(3):528-33. PubMed ID: 23957930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining perceptual and conceptual set biases in multiple-target visual search.
    Biggs AT; Adamo SH; Dowd EW; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):844-55. PubMed ID: 25678271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spacing affects some but not all visual searches: implications for theories of attention and crowding.
    Reddy L; VanRullen R
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):3.1-17. PubMed ID: 18217818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of item clustering on visual search: It all depends on the nature of the visual search.
    Xu Y
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):. PubMed ID: 21177422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Search for two categories of target produces fewer fixations to target-color items.
    Menneer T; Stroud MJ; Cave KR; Li X; Godwin HJ; Liversedge SP; Donnelly N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):404-18. PubMed ID: 23294283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid guidance of visual search by object categories.
    Nako R; Wu R; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 23796065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rare, but obviously there: effects of target frequency and salience on visual search accuracy.
    Biggs AT; Adamo SH; Mitroff SR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Oct; 152():158-65. PubMed ID: 25226547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision processes in visual search as a function of target prevalence.
    Peltier C; Becker MW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1466-76. PubMed ID: 27149294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colour and spatial cueing in low-prevalence visual search.
    Russell NC; Kunar MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1327-44. PubMed ID: 22493942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of Relative Prevalence on dual-target search for threat items from airport X-ray screening.
    Godwin HJ; Menneer T; Cave KR; Helman S; Way RL; Donnelly N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 20129597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short-term consolidation of visual patterns interferes with visuo-spatial attention: converging evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Robitaille N; Jolicoeur P; Dell'Acqua R; Sessa P
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1185():158-69. PubMed ID: 17936730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual search for moving and stationary items in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Matsuno T; Tomonaga M
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 172(2):219-32. PubMed ID: 16790282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual search for item- and array-centered locations in patients with left middle cerebral artery stroke.
    Hildebrandt H; Schütze C; Ebke M; Brunner-Beeg F; Eling P
    Neurocase; 2005 Dec; 11(6):416-26. PubMed ID: 16393755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new step towards understanding Embedded Figures Test performance in the autism spectrum: the radial frequency search task.
    Almeida RA; Dickinson JE; Maybery MT; Badcock JC; Badcock DR
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 19786040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.