These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24270967)

  • 21. Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users in the Difficult Listening Situation: Speech Perception and Subjective Benefit.
    Prejban DA; Hamzavi JS; Arnoldner C; Liepins R; Honeder C; Kaider A; Gstöttner W; Baumgartner WD; Riss D
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Oct; 39(9):e803-e809. PubMed ID: 30199498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A beamformer post-filter for cochlear implant noise reduction.
    Hersbach AA; Grayden DB; Fallon JB; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2412-20. PubMed ID: 23556606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Simulation of speech perception with cochlear implants : Influence of frequency and level of fundamental frequency components with electronic acoustic stimulation].
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 27670421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of Reverberation on Speech Perception and Sound Localization Accuracy in Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.
    Körtje M; Eichenauer A; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jan; 43(1):e30-e37. PubMed ID: 34524223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of reverberation and masking on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations.
    Poissant SF; Whitmal NA; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1606-15. PubMed ID: 16583905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Goldsworthy RL; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Reed CM
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
    Rana B; Buchholz JM; Morgan C; Sharma M; Weller T; Konganda SA; Shirai K; Kawano A
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development and validation of the Leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (LIST-m).
    Jansen S; Koning R; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 24152309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Age standardization and time-of-day performance for the Oldenburg Sentence Test (OLSA): results from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study.
    O'Brien K; Hackenberg B; Döge J; Bohnert A; Rader T; Lackner KJ; Beutel ME; Münzel T; Wild PS; Chalabi J; Schuster AK; Schmidtmann I; Matthias C; Bahr-Hamm K
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 May; 281(5):2341-2351. PubMed ID: 38110748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Effect of Binaural Beamforming Technology on Speech Intelligibility in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; Dingemanse JG; van Immerzeel T; van der Schroeff MP
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 29936510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of noise and reverberation on speech intelligibility for cochlear implant recipients in realistic sound environments.
    Badajoz-Davila J; Buchholz JM; Van-Hoesel R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3538. PubMed ID: 32486825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Blind binary masking for reverberation suppression in cochlear implants.
    Hazrati O; Lee J; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1607-14. PubMed ID: 23464030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users.
    Srinivasan AG; Padilla M; Shannon RV; Landsberger DM
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():29-36. PubMed ID: 23467170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Xia J; Xu B; Pentony S; Xu J; Swaminathan J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1523. PubMed ID: 29604671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spectral contrast enhancement improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implants.
    Nogueira W; Rode T; Büchner A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):728-39. PubMed ID: 26936556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation.
    Reinhart PN; Souza PE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 29309025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interactions Between Digital Noise Reduction and Reverberation: Acoustic and Behavioral Effects.
    Reinhart P; Zahorik P; Souza P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 31267958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perception of consonants in reverberation and noise by adults fitted with bimodal devices.
    Mason M; Kokkinakis K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 57(4):1512-20. PubMed ID: 24686826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of reverberant self- and overlap-masking on speech recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Desmond JM; Collins LM; Throckmorton CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):EL304-10. PubMed ID: 24907838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.