These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24273355)

  • 1. Adaptive Fitting of Linear Mixed-Effects Models with Correlated Random-effects.
    Zhang G; Chen JJ
    J Stat Comput Simul; 2013; 83(12):. PubMed ID: 24273355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pairwise fitting of piecewise mixed models for the joint modeling of multivariate longitudinal outcomes, in a randomized crossover trial.
    Mwangi M; Molenberghs G; Njagi EN; Mwalili S; Braekers R; Florez AJ; Gachau S; Bukania ZN; Verbeke G
    Biom J; 2024 Mar; 66(2):e2200333. PubMed ID: 38499515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. nlive: an R package to facilitate the application of the sigmoidal and random changepoint mixed models.
    Capuano AW; Wagner M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):257. PubMed ID: 37924007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computationally Stable Estimation Procedure for the Multivariate Linear Mixed-Effect Model and Application to Malaria Public Health Problem.
    Adjakossa EH; Hounkonnou NM; Nuel G
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Jun; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 31226099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. nlive: an R Package to facilitate the application of the sigmoidal and random changepoint mixed models.
    Capuano AW; Wagner M
    Res Sq; 2023 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 37090666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gradient boosting for linear mixed models.
    Griesbach C; Säfken B; Waldmann E
    Int J Biostat; 2021 Jan; 17(2):317-329. PubMed ID: 34826371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negative variance components and intercept-slope correlations greater than one in magnitude: How do such "non-regular" random intercept and slope models arise, and what should be done when they do?
    Bridge H; Morgan KE; Frost C
    Stat Med; 2024 Jun; 43(14):2747-2764. PubMed ID: 38695394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of linear mixed models with a mixture of distribution for the random effects.
    Proust C; Jacqmin-Gadda H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 May; 78(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 15848271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The PX-EM algorithm for fast stable fitting of Henderson's mixed model.
    Foulley JL; van Dyk DA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2000; 32(2):143-63. PubMed ID: 14736399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-Fading Factor and Updated Monitoring Strategy Adaptive Kalman Filter-Based Variational Bayesian.
    Shan C; Zhou W; Yang Y; Jiang Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 33396779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accounting for individual-specific variation in habitat-selection studies: Efficient estimation of mixed-effects models using Bayesian or frequentist computation.
    Muff S; Signer J; Fieberg J
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Jan; 89(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 31454066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fast zero-inflated negative binomial mixed modeling approach for analyzing longitudinal metagenomics data.
    Zhang X; Yi N
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(8):2345-2351. PubMed ID: 31904815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Zero-Inflated gaussian mixed models for analyzing longitudinal microbiome data.
    Zhang X; Guo B; Yi N
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242073. PubMed ID: 33166356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-linear mixed-effects pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling in NLME using differential equations.
    Tornøe CW; Agersø H; Jonsson EN; Madsen H; Nielsen HA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Oct; 76(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 15313540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of breeding values for mean and dispersion, their variance and correlation using double hierarchical generalized linear models.
    Felleki M; Lee D; Lee Y; Gilmour AR; Rönnegård L
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Dec; 94(6):307-17. PubMed ID: 23374241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Formation of parametric images using mixed-effects models: a feasibility study.
    Huang HM; Shih YY; Lin C
    NMR Biomed; 2016 Mar; 29(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 26915793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing random effects in linear mixed-effects models with serially correlated errors.
    Drikvandi R; Noorian S
    Biom J; 2019 Jul; 61(4):802-812. PubMed ID: 30721539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of the linear mixed integrated Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model.
    Hughes RA; Kenward MG; Sterne JAC; Tilling K
    J Stat Comput Simul; 2017 May; 87(8):1541-1558. PubMed ID: 28515536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Logistic Regression with Multiple Random Effects: A Simulation Study of Estimation Methods and Statistical Packages.
    Kim Y; Choi YK; Emery S
    Am Stat; 2013 Aug; 67(3):. PubMed ID: 24288415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maximum likelihood estimation based on Newton-Raphson iteration for the bivariate random effects model in test accuracy meta-analysis.
    Willis BH; Baragilly M; Coomar D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1197-1211. PubMed ID: 31184270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.