281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24273893)
1. Detecting methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: comparison of different phenotypic methods and the polymerase chain reaction.
Ahmad S
Br J Biomed Sci; 2013; 70(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 24273893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of phenotypic methods with mecA gene based polymerase chain reaction for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus detection.
Khawaja A; Arshad F; Khan I
J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 Feb; 70(2):276-280. PubMed ID: 32063621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Detection of mecA in strains with oxacillin and cefoxitin disk tests for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus].
Lee Y; Kim CK; Kim M; Yong D; Lee K; Chong Y
Korean J Lab Med; 2007 Aug; 27(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 18094588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of cefoxitin disc diffusion test, oxacillin screen agar, and PCR for mecA gene for detection of MRSA.
Anand KB; Agrawal P; Kumar S; Kapila K
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2009; 27(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 19172055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of the cefoxitin 30 microg disk diffusion method for detection of methicillin-resistance in selected Staphylococcus aureus isolates].
Batista N; Gutiérrez I; Lara M; Laich F; Méndez S
Rev Esp Quimioter; 2008 Dec; 21(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 19031121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test.
Felten A; Grandry B; Lagrange PH; Casin I
J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Aug; 40(8):2766-71. PubMed ID: 12149327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accurate detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in day to day practice: a great help to clinicians.
Mallick SK; Basak S
J Indian Med Assoc; 2011 Dec; 109(12):892-5. PubMed ID: 23469569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. mecA-positive methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in Zenica-Doboj Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Kamberović F; Ibrahimagić A; Uzunović S; Budimir A; Rijnders MI; Stobberingh EE
J Chemother; 2015; 27(6):330-6. PubMed ID: 25112955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laboratory evaluation of phenotypic detection methods of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Kali A; Stephen S; Umadevi S
Biomed J; 2014; 37(6):411-4. PubMed ID: 25179712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of new Vitek 2 card and disk diffusion method for determining susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to oxacillin.
Roisin S; Nonhoff C; Denis O; Struelens MJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 46(8):2525-8. PubMed ID: 18550733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of oxacillin, cefoxitin, ceftizoxime, and moxalactam disk diffusion methods for detection of methicillin susceptibility in staphylococci].
Özel G; Aslan V; Bahar Erdem G; Çağatay M; Sencan I; Mert A
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Apr; 45(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 21644068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation and comparison of tests to detect methicillin resistant S. aureus.
Mathews AA; Thomas M; Appalaraju B; Jayalakshmi J
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2010; 53(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 20090228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Different Phenotypic Approaches To Screen and Detect
Kriegeskorte A; Idelevich EA; Schlattmann A; Layer F; Strommenger B; Denis O; Paterson GK; Holmes MA; Werner G; Becker K
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 28978682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laboratory detection methods for methicillin resistance in coagulase negative Staphylococcus isolated from ophthalmic infections.
Oliveira AD; d'Azevedo PA; de Sousa LB; Viana-Niero C; Francisco W; Lottenberg C; Martino MD; Höfling-Lima AL
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(4):667-75. PubMed ID: 17906764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of disk-diffusion method and PCR for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus strains].
Kaczmarek A; Budzyńska A; Mikołajczyk D; Gospodarek E
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2006; 58(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 17133901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Phenotypic MRSA Detection Methods with PCR for
Nair D; Shashindran N; Kumar A; Vinodh V; Biswas L; Biswas R
Microb Drug Resist; 2021 Sep; 27(9):1190-1194. PubMed ID: 33689504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of methicillin/oxacillin resistance and typing in aminoglycoside-susceptible methicillin-resistant and kanamycin-tobramycin-resistant methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.
Hamdad F; Donda F; Lefebvre JF; Laurans G; Biendo M; Thomas D; Canarelli B; Rousseau F; Eb F
Microb Drug Resist; 2006; 12(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 17002544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of mecA polymerase chain reaction with phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Baddour MM; AbuElKheir MM; Fatani AJ
Curr Microbiol; 2007 Dec; 55(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 17924164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of different tests to detect methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Tiwari HK; Sapkota D; Das AK; Sen MR
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2009 Jul; 40(4):801-6. PubMed ID: 19842418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence and genotypic relatedness of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital.
Fomda BA; Thokar MA; Bashir G; Khan A; Kour A; Zahoor D; Ray P
J Postgrad Med; 2014; 60(4):386-9. PubMed ID: 25370547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
