These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24273893)
1. Detecting methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: comparison of different phenotypic methods and the polymerase chain reaction. Ahmad S Br J Biomed Sci; 2013; 70(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 24273893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of phenotypic methods with mecA gene based polymerase chain reaction for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus detection. Khawaja A; Arshad F; Khan I J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 Feb; 70(2):276-280. PubMed ID: 32063621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Detection of mecA in strains with oxacillin and cefoxitin disk tests for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus]. Lee Y; Kim CK; Kim M; Yong D; Lee K; Chong Y Korean J Lab Med; 2007 Aug; 27(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 18094588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of cefoxitin disc diffusion test, oxacillin screen agar, and PCR for mecA gene for detection of MRSA. Anand KB; Agrawal P; Kumar S; Kapila K Indian J Med Microbiol; 2009; 27(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 19172055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of the cefoxitin 30 microg disk diffusion method for detection of methicillin-resistance in selected Staphylococcus aureus isolates]. Batista N; Gutiérrez I; Lara M; Laich F; Méndez S Rev Esp Quimioter; 2008 Dec; 21(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 19031121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test. Felten A; Grandry B; Lagrange PH; Casin I J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Aug; 40(8):2766-71. PubMed ID: 12149327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accurate detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in day to day practice: a great help to clinicians. Mallick SK; Basak S J Indian Med Assoc; 2011 Dec; 109(12):892-5. PubMed ID: 23469569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. mecA-positive methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in Zenica-Doboj Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Kamberović F; Ibrahimagić A; Uzunović S; Budimir A; Rijnders MI; Stobberingh EE J Chemother; 2015; 27(6):330-6. PubMed ID: 25112955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laboratory evaluation of phenotypic detection methods of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Kali A; Stephen S; Umadevi S Biomed J; 2014; 37(6):411-4. PubMed ID: 25179712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of new Vitek 2 card and disk diffusion method for determining susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to oxacillin. Roisin S; Nonhoff C; Denis O; Struelens MJ J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 46(8):2525-8. PubMed ID: 18550733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of oxacillin, cefoxitin, ceftizoxime, and moxalactam disk diffusion methods for detection of methicillin susceptibility in staphylococci]. Özel G; Aslan V; Bahar Erdem G; Çağatay M; Sencan I; Mert A Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Apr; 45(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 21644068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation and comparison of tests to detect methicillin resistant S. aureus. Mathews AA; Thomas M; Appalaraju B; Jayalakshmi J Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2010; 53(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 20090228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Different Phenotypic Approaches To Screen and Detect Kriegeskorte A; Idelevich EA; Schlattmann A; Layer F; Strommenger B; Denis O; Paterson GK; Holmes MA; Werner G; Becker K J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 28978682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laboratory detection methods for methicillin resistance in coagulase negative Staphylococcus isolated from ophthalmic infections. Oliveira AD; d'Azevedo PA; de Sousa LB; Viana-Niero C; Francisco W; Lottenberg C; Martino MD; Höfling-Lima AL Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(4):667-75. PubMed ID: 17906764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of disk-diffusion method and PCR for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus strains]. Kaczmarek A; Budzyńska A; Mikołajczyk D; Gospodarek E Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2006; 58(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 17133901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Phenotypic MRSA Detection Methods with PCR for Nair D; Shashindran N; Kumar A; Vinodh V; Biswas L; Biswas R Microb Drug Resist; 2021 Sep; 27(9):1190-1194. PubMed ID: 33689504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of methicillin/oxacillin resistance and typing in aminoglycoside-susceptible methicillin-resistant and kanamycin-tobramycin-resistant methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Hamdad F; Donda F; Lefebvre JF; Laurans G; Biendo M; Thomas D; Canarelli B; Rousseau F; Eb F Microb Drug Resist; 2006; 12(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 17002544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of mecA polymerase chain reaction with phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Baddour MM; AbuElKheir MM; Fatani AJ Curr Microbiol; 2007 Dec; 55(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 17924164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of different tests to detect methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Tiwari HK; Sapkota D; Das AK; Sen MR Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2009 Jul; 40(4):801-6. PubMed ID: 19842418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence and genotypic relatedness of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital. Fomda BA; Thokar MA; Bashir G; Khan A; Kour A; Zahoor D; Ray P J Postgrad Med; 2014; 60(4):386-9. PubMed ID: 25370547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]