207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24274958)
1. Modified tandem traction bow appliance compared with facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
Tortop T; Kaygisiz E; Gencer D; Yuksel S; Atalay Z
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):642-8. PubMed ID: 24274958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment with facemask and removable upper appliance versus modified tandem traction bow appliance: the effects on mandibular space.
Tortop T; Kaygisiz E; Erkun S; Yuksel S
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 29059295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of double-plate appliance/facemask combination and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions.
Gencer D; Kaygisiz E; Yüksel S; Tortop T
Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 24913739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination.
Nienkemper M; Wilmes B; Pauls A; Drescher D
Prog Orthod; 2013 May; 14(1):5. PubMed ID: 24325812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study.
Masucci C; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Defraia E
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Nov; 17(4):259-69. PubMed ID: 25041370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of face mask and tongue plate on maxillary deficiency in growing patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Showkatbakhsh R; Toumarian L; Jamilian A; Sheibaninia A; Mirkarimi M; Taban T
J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 40(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 23794693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early and late facemask therapy.
Yüksel S; Uçem TT; Keykubat A
Eur J Orthod; 2001 Oct; 23(5):559-68. PubMed ID: 11668875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dental and skeletal components of Class II open bite treatment with a modified Thurow appliance.
Jacob HB; dos Santos-Pinto A; Buschang PH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24713556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Hybrid Hyrax Distalizer, a new all-in-one appliance for rapid palatal expansion, early class III treatment and upper molar distalization.
Wilmes B; Ludwig B; Katyal V; Nienkemper M; Rein A; Drescher D
J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S47-53. PubMed ID: 25138366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children.
Owens D; Watkinson S; Harrison JE; Turner S; Worthington HV
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 Apr; 4(4):CD003451. PubMed ID: 38597341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cranial-base morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
Sanggarnjanavanich S; Sekiya T; Nomura Y; Nakayama T; Hanada N; Nakamura Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 24975002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.
Caprioglio A; Cozzani M; Fontana M
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):49. PubMed ID: 25139288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion combined with chincup protraction followed by fixed appliances.
Palma JC; Tejedor-Sanz N; Oteo MD; Alarcón JA
Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24892796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chin cup effects using two different force magnitudes in the management of Class III malocclusions.
Abdelnaby YL; Nassar EA
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):957-62. PubMed ID: 20578869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the effects of face mask treatment started simultaneously and after the completion of the alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction procedure.
Canturk BH; Celikoglu M
Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 25017013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
