These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24274958)

  • 21. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
    Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of modified and conventional facemask therapies with expansion on dynamic measurement of natural head position in Class III patients.
    Yagci A; Uysal T; Usumez S; Orhan M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e223-31. PubMed ID: 22051500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients.
    Heinrichs DA; Shammaa I; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):45. PubMed ID: 25138988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible?
    Strahm C; De Sousa AP; Grobéty D; Mavropoulos A; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 19395370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dentoskeletal Effects of the Modified Tandem Appliance vs the Facemask Appliance in the Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Single-center, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Husson AH; Burhan AS; Salma FB; Nawaya FR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):522-9. PubMed ID: 27595716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Skeletal and dental effects of molar distalization using a modified palatal anchorage plate in adolescents.
    Sa'aed NL; Park CO; Bayome M; Park JH; Kim Y; Kook YA
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):657-64. PubMed ID: 25191840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative cephalometric study of Class II malocclusion treatment with Pendulum and Jones jig appliances followed by fixed corrective orthodontics.
    Patel MP; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Janson G; de Freitas MR
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):58-64. PubMed ID: 24351151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
    Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dentofacial effects of a modified tandem traction bow appliance.
    Atalay Z; Tortop T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 20348164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The efficacy of Hybrid Hyrax-Mentoplate combination in early Class III treatment: a novel approach and pilot study.
    Katyal V; Wilmes B; Nienkemper M; Darendeliler MA; Sampson W; Drescher D
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 27468596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Treatment response to maxillary expansion and protraction.
    Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):151-68. PubMed ID: 8670927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Class III correction using an inter-arch spring-loaded module.
    Vanlaecken R; Williams MO; Razmus T; Gunel E; Martin C; Ngan P
    Prog Orthod; 2014 May; 15(1):32. PubMed ID: 24934153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Geometric morphometric analysis of the pharyngeal airway during treatment of Class III malocclusion.
    Kaygisiz E; Ocakoglu G; Kurnaz M; Yüksel S; Tortop T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Sep; 162(3):374-385. PubMed ID: 35537998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of a modified reverse headgear force applied with a facebow on the dentofacial structures.
    Göyenç Y; Ersoy S
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 14994882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
    Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A novel approach in treatment of maxillary deficiency by reverse chin cup.
    Showkatbakhsh R; Jamilian A
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(2):27-31. PubMed ID: 20687313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stability of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy: a long-term controlled study.
    Masucci C; Franchi L; Defraia E; Mucedero M; Cozza P; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 21967936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-term results of surgically assisted maxillary protraction vs regular facemask.
    Nevzatoğlu S; Küçükkeleş N
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1002-9. PubMed ID: 24654941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.