These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24275021)

  • 1. Integrating multimodal transport into cellulosic biofuel supply chain design under feedstock seasonality with a case study based on California.
    Xie F; Huang Y; Eksioglu S
    Bioresour Technol; 2014; 152():15-23. PubMed ID: 24275021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrated strategic and tactical biomass-biofuel supply chain optimization.
    Lin T; Rodríguez LF; Shastri YN; Hansen AC; Ting KC
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Mar; 156():256-66. PubMed ID: 24508904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomass logistics analysis for large scale biofuel production: case study of loblolly pine and switchgrass.
    Lu X; Withers MR; Seifkar N; Field RP; Barrett SR; Herzog HJ
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 May; 183():1-9. PubMed ID: 25710677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relative cost of biomass energy transport.
    Searcy E; Flynn P; Ghafoori E; Kumar A
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2007 Apr; 137-140(1-12):639-52. PubMed ID: 18478422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomass Cost Index: mapping biomass-to-biohydrogen feedstock costs by a new approach.
    Diamantopoulou LK; Karaoglanoglou LS; Koukios EG
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Feb; 102(3):2641-50. PubMed ID: 21074419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Logistics system design for biomass-to-bioenergy industry with multiple types of feedstocks.
    Zhu X; Yao Q
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Dec; 102(23):10936-45. PubMed ID: 21974884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of air pollution control costs on the cost and spatial arrangement of cellulosic biofuel production in the U.S.
    Murphy CW; Parker NC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Feb; 48(4):2157-64. PubMed ID: 24467277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Insights into engineering of cellulosic ethanol].
    Yue G; Wu G; Lin X
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2014 Jun; 30(6):816-27. PubMed ID: 25212000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A mathematical model to design a lignocellulosic biofuel supply chain system with a case study based on a region in Central Texas.
    An H; Wilhelm WE; Searcy SW
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Sep; 102(17):7860-70. PubMed ID: 21724388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomass transportation model and optimum plant size for the production of ethanol.
    Leboreiro J; Hilaly AK
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Feb; 102(3):2712-23. PubMed ID: 21109426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bio-oil transport by pipeline: a techno-economic assessment.
    Pootakham T; Kumar A
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Sep; 101(18):7148-54. PubMed ID: 20434906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review: Continuous hydrolysis and fermentation for cellulosic ethanol production.
    Brethauer S; Wyman CE
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jul; 101(13):4862-74. PubMed ID: 20006926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling switchgrass derived cellulosic ethanol distribution in the United States.
    Morrow WR; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 May; 40(9):2877-86. PubMed ID: 16719086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Challenges in scaling up biofuels infrastructure.
    Richard TL
    Science; 2010 Aug; 329(5993):793-6. PubMed ID: 20705852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comprehensive approach to the design of ethanol supply chains including carbon trading effects.
    Giarola S; Shah N; Bezzo F
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Mar; 107():175-85. PubMed ID: 22225607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Challenges and models in supporting logistics system design for dedicated-biomass-based bioenergy industry.
    Zhu X; Li X; Yao Q; Chen Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):1344-51. PubMed ID: 20863690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost evaluation of cellulase enzyme for industrial-scale cellulosic ethanol production based on rigorous Aspen Plus modeling.
    Liu G; Zhang J; Bao J
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2016 Jan; 39(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 26541585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Water Availability for Biorefineries in the Contiguous United States and the Implications for Bioenergy Production Distribution.
    Yang P; Piao X; Cai X
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Mar; 56(6):3748-3757. PubMed ID: 35191678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can dispersed biomass processing protect the environment and cover the bottom line for biofuel?
    Egbendewe-Mondzozo A; Swinton SM; Bals BD; Dale BE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Feb; 47(3):1695-703. PubMed ID: 23259686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing county-level water footprints of different cellulosic-biofuel feedstock pathways.
    Chiu YW; Wu M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Aug; 46(16):9155-62. PubMed ID: 22816524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.