170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24275727)
1. Cost-effectiveness of screening men in Maricopa County jails for chlamydia and gonorrhea to avert infections in women.
Gopalappa C; Huang YL; Gift TL; Owusu-Edusei K; Taylor M; Gales V
Sex Transm Dis; 2013 Oct; 40(10):776-83. PubMed ID: 24275727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of universal screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea in US jails.
Kraut-Becher JR; Gift TL; Haddix AC; Irwin KL; Greifinger RB
J Urban Health; 2004 Sep; 81(3):453-71. PubMed ID: 15273268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The contribution of a urine-based jail screening program to citywide male Chlamydia and gonorrhea case rates in New York City.
Pathela P; Hennessy RR; Blank S; Parvez F; Franklin W; Schillinger JA
Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Feb; 36(2 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 17989586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cost-effectiveness of an outreach clinical model in the management and prevention of gonorrhea and chlamydia among Chinese female sex workers in Hong Kong.
You JH; Wong WC; Sin CW; Woo J
Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Apr; 33(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 16434885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preventing sexually transmitted infections among incarcerated men who have sex with men: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Tuli K; Kerndt PR
Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Feb; 36(2 Suppl):S41-8. PubMed ID: 18303352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cost-effectiveness evaluation of a jail-based chlamydia screening program for men and its impact on their partners in the community.
Gift TL; Lincoln T; Tuthill R; Whelan M; Briggs LP; Conklin T; Irwin KL
Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Oct; 33(10 Suppl):S103-10. PubMed ID: 17003677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of two screening strategies for
van Wifferen F; Hoornenborg E; Schim van der Loeff MF; Heijne J; van Hoek AJ
Sex Transm Infect; 2021 Dec; 97(8):607-612. PubMed ID: 33431605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of five strategies for gonorrhea and chlamydia control among female and male emergency department patients.
Mehta SD; Bishai D; Howell MR; Rothman RE; Quinn TC; Zenilman JM
Sex Transm Dis; 2002 Feb; 29(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 11818893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chlamydia and gonorrhea diagnosis, treatment, personnel cost savings, and service delivery improvements after the implementation of express sexually transmitted disease testing in Maricopa County, Arizona.
Rukh S; Khurana R; Mickey T; Anderson L; Velasquez C; Taylor M
Sex Transm Dis; 2014 Jan; 41(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 24326585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for Chlamydia on admission to detention.
Blake DR; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC
Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Feb; 31(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 14743071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of screening swab or urine specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis from young Canadian women in Ontario.
Goeree R; Jang D; Blackhouse G; Chong S; Mahony J; Sellors J; Foy A; Chernesky M
Sex Transm Dis; 2001 Dec; 28(12):701-9. PubMed ID: 11725225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A tale of two sexually transmitted diseases. Prevalences and predictors of chlamydia and gonorrhea in women attending Colorado family planning clinics.
Gershman KA; Barrow JC
Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(6):481-8. PubMed ID: 8946633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost and effectiveness of Chlamydia screening among male military recruits: Markov modeling of complications averted through notification of prior female partners.
Nevin RL; Shuping EE; Frick KD; Gaydos JC; Gaydos CA
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Aug; 35(8):705-13. PubMed ID: 18461015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimated Impact of Screening on Gonorrhea Epidemiology in the United States: Insights From a Mathematical Model.
Tuite AR; Rönn MM; Wolf EE; Gift TL; Chesson HW; Berruti A; Galer K; Menzies NA; Hsu K; Salomon JA
Sex Transm Dis; 2018 Nov; 45(11):713-722. PubMed ID: 29894368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Small reservoirs: jail screening for gonorrhea and Chlamydia in low prevalence areas.
Spaulding AC; Clarke JG; Jongco AM; Flanigan TP
J Correct Health Care; 2009 Jan; 15(1):28-34; quiz 80-1. PubMed ID: 19477809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of partner pharmacotherapy in screening women for asymptomatic infection with Chlamydia Trachomatis.
Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Jager HC; Coutinho RA
Value Health; 2001; 4(3):266-75. PubMed ID: 11705188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening for sexually transmitted diseases in short-term correctional institutions: summary of evidence reviewed for the 2010 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines.
Spaulding AC; Miller J; Trigg BG; Braverman P; Lincoln T; Reams PN; Staples-Horne M; Sumbry A; Rice D; Satterwhite CL
Sex Transm Dis; 2013 Sep; 40(9):679-84. PubMed ID: 23945422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk assessment and other screening options for gonorrhoea and chlamydial infections in women attending rural Tanzanian antenatal clinics.
Mayaud P; Grosskurth H; Changalucha J; Todd J; West B; Gabone R; Senkoro K; Rusizoka M; Laga M; Hayes R
Bull World Health Organ; 1995; 73(5):621-30. PubMed ID: 8846488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An economic evaluation of a school-based sexually transmitted disease screening program.
Wang LY; Burstein GR; Cohen DA
Sex Transm Dis; 2002 Dec; 29(12):737-45. PubMed ID: 12466713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Opt-In Versus Opt-Out Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Inmates in a County Jail.
Shaikh RA; Simonsen KA; O'Keefe A; Earley M; Foxall M; Islam KM; Person A; Boyle C; Sandkovsky U; Margalit R
J Correct Health Care; 2015 Oct; 21(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 26285597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
