These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24277544)

  • 1. A comment on the debate on primary prevention.
    Levine M
    J Prim Prev; 1985 Jun; 5(4):276-83. PubMed ID: 24277544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New directions in the primary prevention of mental problems: Comment on a debate.
    Room R
    J Prim Prev; 1985 Jun; 5(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 24277548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Formal comment on "Systematic review of the predictors of statin adherence for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease".
    Diamond DM; de Lorgeril M; Kendrick M; Ravnskov U; Rosch PJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0205138. PubMed ID: 30653537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary prevention: Should we support both practice and research?
    Muñoz RF
    J Prim Prev; 1985 Jun; 5(4):284-92. PubMed ID: 24277545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comment on the debate surrounding single- and multifactorial falls prevention interventions.
    Russell MA; Hill KD; Haines TP
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2009 Sep; 57(9):1708-9. PubMed ID: 19895434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A debate about the merits of debate in nurse education.
    Hartin P; Birks M; Bodak M; Woods C; Hitchins M
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2017 Sep; 26():118-120. PubMed ID: 28804015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Last word.
    Albee GW
    J Prim Prev; 1985 Jun; 5(4):310-2. PubMed ID: 24277550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The debate on primary prevention: Toward a synthesis.
    Elkins DN
    J Prim Prev; 1985 Jun; 5(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 24277538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized controlled trials remain fundamental to clinical decision making in Type II diabetes mellitus: a comment to the debate on randomized controlled trials (For debate).
    Richter B; Berger M
    Diabetologia; 2000 Apr; 43(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 10819251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized controlled trials remain fundamental to clinical decision making in Type II diabetes mellitus: a comment to the debate on randomized controlled trials (For debate) [corrected].
    Richter B; Berger M
    Diabetologia; 2000 Feb; 43(2):254-8. PubMed ID: 10753051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The quantitative/qualitative debate over 'relapse' behaviour: Comment.
    Stall R; Ekstrand M
    AIDS Care; 1994 Sep; 6(5):619-624. PubMed ID: 29671610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comment on Debate: Blood is Friend or/and Foe?
    Raghuraman MS
    Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2018 Feb; 46(1):69. PubMed ID: 30140505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comment on Torgeir Bruun Wyller’s debate article].
    Thompson EN
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2021 Nov; 141(17):. PubMed ID: 34813221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Raising the bar for primary prevention: comment on "cardiovascular primary prevention".
    Redberg RF
    Arch Intern Med; 2012 Apr; 172(8):659. PubMed ID: 23446779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Mammographic screening--a comment to the debate].
    Lindberg MJ
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Mar; 97(12):1452. PubMed ID: 10765629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comment on "Proton beam and prostate cancer: An evolving debate" by Anthony Zietman [Rep. Pract. Oncol. Radiother. 2013;18:338-42].
    Rossi CJ
    Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2013; 18(6):343. PubMed ID: 24416576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reply to comment on 'Reforming the debate around radiation risk? Advancing the status quo is not a reformation'.
    Ross JC; Fongenie B; Vilić D
    J Radiol Prot; 2019 Sep; 39(3):981-983. PubMed ID: 31461415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical debate-Intra-arterial thrombolysis should be the initial treatment of the acutely ischaemic lower limb: Assessor's comment.
    Wolfe JH
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1992 Mar; 74(2):111. PubMed ID: 19311383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comment on "Debate--does a reversible penumbra exist in intracerebral haemorrhage?".
    Mitchell P; Gregson B
    Br J Neurosurg; 2011 Aug; 25(4):526. PubMed ID: 21767127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Research and common sense. Concluding comment on a debate].
    Rehfeld JF
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Dec; 154(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 1781065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.