109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24277871)
1. Total Monte Carlo evaluation for dose calculations.
Sjöstrand H; Alhassan E; Conroy S; Duan J; Hellesen C; Pomp S; Österlund M; Koning A; Rochman D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):312-5. PubMed ID: 24277871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reference dosimetry calculations for neutron capture therapy with comparison of analytical and voxel models.
Goorley JT; Kiger WS; Zamenhof RG
Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 11865986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intercomparison of Monte Carlo radiation transport codes to model TEPC response in low-energy neutron and gamma-ray fields.
Ali F; Waker AJ; Waller EJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):257-60. PubMed ID: 24162375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Test of a bubble passive spectrometer for neutron dosimetry.
Zanini A; Fasolo F; Visca L; Durisi E; Perosino M; Annand JR; Burn KW
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(18):4287-97. PubMed ID: 16148394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements.
Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A theoretical approach for non-equilibrium radiation dosimetry.
Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3493-9. PubMed ID: 18552420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Monte Carlo method to evaluate the impact of positioning errors on detector response and quality correction factors in nonstandard beams.
Bouchard H; Seuntjens J; Kawrakow I
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 56(8):2617-34. PubMed ID: 21454927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric assessment and characterisation of the neutron field around a Howitzer container using a Bonner sphere spectrometer, Monte Carlo simulations and the NSDann and NSDUAZ unfolding codes.
Barros S; Gallego E; Lorente A; Gonçalves IF; Vaz P; Vega-Carrillo HR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 154(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 22989495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo calculations of lung dose in ORNL phantom for boron neutron capture therapy.
Krstic D; Markovic VM; Jovanovic Z; Milenkovic B; Nikezic D; Atanackovic J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):269-73. PubMed ID: 24435912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pitfalls and modelling inconsistencies in computational radiation dosimetry: lessons learnt from the QUADOS intercomparison. Part I: Neutrons and uncertainties.
Siebert BR; Tanner RJ; Chartier JL; Agosteo S; Grosswendt B; Gualdrini G; Ménard S; Kodeli I; Leuthold GP; Price RA; Tagziria H; Terrissol M; Zankl M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 16698968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uncertainties in personal dosimetry for external radiation: a Monte Carlo approach.
van Dijk JW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 17052989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of a Monte Carlo method for uncertainty calculation, with an application to the measurement of neutron ambient dose equivalent rate.
Cox M; Harris P; Nam G; Thomas D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 16877469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurements with the new PHE neutron survey instrument.
Eakins JS; Tanner RJ; Hager LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):58-61. PubMed ID: 24126484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian approach for quantifying the uncertainty of neutron doses derived from spectrometric measurements.
Reginatto M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 16877470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neutron H*(10) inside a proton therapy facility: comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and WENDI-2 measurements.
De Smet V; Stichelbaut F; Vanaudenhove T; Mathot G; De Lentdecker G; Dubus A; Pauly N; Gerardy I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):417-21. PubMed ID: 24255173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterisation of the IRSN graphite moderated Americium-Beryllium neutron field.
Lacoste V; Gressier V; Muller H; Lebreton L;
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):135-9. PubMed ID: 15353636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo treatment planning for molecular targeted radiotherapy within the MINERVA system.
Lehmann J; Hartmann Siantar C; Wessol DE; Wemple CA; Nigg D; Cogliati J; Daly T; Descalle MA; Flickinger T; Pletcher D; Denardo G
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):947-58. PubMed ID: 15798267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating uncertainty on internal dose assessments.
Puncher M; Birchall A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):544-7. PubMed ID: 17993651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neutron absorbed dose determination by calculations of recoil energy.
Wrobel F; Benabdesselam M; Iacconi P; Lapraz D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):807-11. PubMed ID: 15353750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement and simulation of neutron beam fluence energy distributions at the neutron time-of-flight facility of iThemba Labs.
Herbert MS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):377-82. PubMed ID: 24667277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
