These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24278765)

  • 21. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
    Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
    JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Trends in teenage termination of pregnancy and its risk factors: a population-based study in Finland, 1987-2009.
    Leppälahti S; Gissler M; Mentula M; Heikinheimo O
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Sep; 27(9):2829-36. PubMed ID: 22777526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Abortion on demand in a post-Wade context: must the state pay the bills?
    Fordham Law Rev; 1973; 41(4):921-44. PubMed ID: 11661025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.
    Landrigan PJ; Raps H; Cropper M; Bald C; Brunner M; Canonizado EM; Charles D; Chiles TC; Donohue MJ; Enck J; Fenichel P; Fleming LE; Ferrier-Pages C; Fordham R; Gozt A; Griffin C; Hahn ME; Haryanto B; Hixson R; Ianelli H; James BD; Kumar P; Laborde A; Law KL; Martin K; Mu J; Mulders Y; Mustapha A; Niu J; Pahl S; Park Y; Pedrotti ML; Pitt JA; Ruchirawat M; Seewoo BJ; Spring M; Stegeman JJ; Suk W; Symeonides C; Takada H; Thompson RC; Vicini A; Wang Z; Whitman E; Wirth D; Wolff M; Yousuf AK; Dunlop S
    Ann Glob Health; 2023; 89(1):23. PubMed ID: 36969097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Webster versus reproductive health services.
    Rhodes AM
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Counseling for the option of termination of pregnancy for severe fetal anomalies in light of the recent Supreme Court ruling to remove the constitutional right to an abortion.
    Grünebaum A; Moreno JD; Esq SP; Chervenak FA
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Jun; 28(3):101441. PubMed ID: 37121833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Projected Health Outcomes Associated With 3 US Supreme Court Decisions in 2022 on COVID-19 Workplace Protections, Handgun-Carry Restrictions, and Abortion Rights.
    Gaffney A; Himmelstein DU; Dickman S; Myers C; Hemenway D; McCormick D; Woolhandler S
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jun; 6(6):e2315578. PubMed ID: 37289459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The end of Roe v. Wade: implications for Women's mental health and care.
    Londoño Tobón A; McNicholas E; Clare CA; Ireland LD; Payne JL; Moore Simas TA; Scott RK; Becker M; Byatt N
    Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1087045. PubMed ID: 37215676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A cross-cultural history of abortion.
    Shain RN
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 3519038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Abortion: the new debate.
    Callahan D
    Prim Care; 1986 Jun; 13(2):255-62. PubMed ID: 3523563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.
    Bøg M; Filges T; Jørgensen AMK
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-127. PubMed ID: 37131363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Editorial: The right to choose abortion.
    Roemer R
    Am J Public Health; 1974 Aug; 64(8):751 passim. PubMed ID: 4835139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart?
    Schmutz SD
    Houst Law Rev; 2002; 39(2):529-66. PubMed ID: 15212035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
    Charo RA
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. United States Supreme Court and abortion. 3.
    Holman EJ
    JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(4):447-8. PubMed ID: 4741028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. When children have children: the teen pregnancy predicament.
    Carter DM; Felice ME; Rosoff J; Zabin LS; Beilenson PL; Dannenberg AL
    Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 8037929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The End of
    Ziegler M
    Am J Bioeth; 2022 Aug; 22(8):16-21. PubMed ID: 35593911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.