68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24279597)
1. Physical activity monitoring in stroke: SenseWear Pro2 activity accelerometer versus Yamax Digi-Walker SW-200 pedometer.
Vanroy C; Vissers D; Cras P; Beyne S; Feys H; Vanlandewijck Y; Truijen S
Disabil Rehabil; 2014; 36(20):1695-703. PubMed ID: 24279597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of the SenseWear armband step count measure during controlled and free-living conditions.
Lee JA; Laurson KR
J Exerc Sci Fit; 2015 Jun; 13(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 29541094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinimetric properties of a novel feedback device for assessing gait parameters in stroke survivors.
Punt M; van Alphen B; van de Port IG; van Dieën JH; Michael K; Outermans J; Wittink H
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Mar; 11():30. PubMed ID: 24597594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cadence Feedback With ECE PEDO to Monitor Physical Activity Intensity: A Pilot Study.
Ardic F; Göcer E
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(10):e3025. PubMed ID: 26962822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement between pedometer and accelerometer in measuring physical activity in overweight and obese pregnant women.
Kinnunen TI; Tennant PW; McParlin C; Poston L; Robson SC; Bell R
BMC Public Health; 2011 Jun; 11():501. PubMed ID: 21703033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Which activity monitor to use? Validity, reproducibility and user friendliness of three activity monitors.
Berendsen BA; Hendriks MR; Meijer K; Plasqui G; Schaper NC; Savelberg HH
BMC Public Health; 2014 Jul; 14():749. PubMed ID: 25059233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity of six activity monitors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a comparison with indirect calorimetry.
Van Remoortel H; Raste Y; Louvaris Z; Giavedoni S; Burtin C; Langer D; Wilson F; Rabinovich R; Vogiatzis I; Hopkinson NS; Troosters T;
PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e39198. PubMed ID: 22745715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of pedometer data in samples of youth and older women.
Strycker LA; Duncan SC; Chaumeton NR; Duncan TE; Toobert DJ
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2007 Feb; 4():4. PubMed ID: 17306031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physical Activity Monitoring Preferences in Adults With Bipolar Disorder.
Janney CA; Ducheine AR; Reichmann R; Stack MA; Fagiolini A
Front Psychiatry; 2021; 12():657043. PubMed ID: 34366911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity of Activity Monitor Step Detection Is Related to Movement Patterns.
Hickey A; John D; Sasaki JE; Mavilia M; Freedson P
J Phys Act Health; 2016 Feb; 13(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 26107045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Concurrent validation of the Actigraph gt3x+, Polar Active accelerometer, Omron HJ-720 and Yamax Digiwalker SW-701 pedometer step counts in lab-based and free-living settings.
Lee JA; Williams SM; Brown DD; Laurson KR
J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 25517396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring reliability and validity of the ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer for children with cerebral palsy: a feasibility study.
O'Neil ME; Fragala-Pinkham MA; Forman JL; Trost SG
J Pediatr Rehabil Med; 2014; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 25260506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Counting Steps in Institutionalized Older Adults During Daily Life Activities: The Validation of Two Motion Sensors.
Martien S; Delecluse C; Seghers J; Boen F
J Aging Phys Act; 2015 Jul; 23(3):383-90. PubMed ID: 25102473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of the Omron pedometer and the actigraph step count function in preschoolers.
De Craemer M; De Decker E; Santos-Lozano A; Verloigne M; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Deforche B; Cardon G
J Sci Med Sport; 2015 May; 18(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 24994695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and validity of the multimedia activity recall in children and adults (MARCA) in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Hunt T; Williams MT; Olds TS
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e81274. PubMed ID: 24312284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a novel activity monitor in impaired, slow-walking, crutch-supported patients.
van Laarhoven SN; Lipperts M; Bolink SA; Senden R; Heyligers IC; Grimm B
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2016 Dec; 59(5-6):308-313. PubMed ID: 27659237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Remote Physical Activity Monitoring in Neurological Disease: A Systematic Review.
Block VA; Pitsch E; Tahir P; Cree BA; Allen DD; Gelfand JM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0154335. PubMed ID: 27124611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers.
Evenson KR; Goto MM; Furberg RD
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():159. PubMed ID: 26684758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validating accelerometry as a measure of physical activity and energy expenditure in chronic stroke.
Serra MC; Balraj E; DiSanzo BL; Ivey FM; Hafer-Macko CE; Treuth MS; Ryan AS
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2017 Jan; 24(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 27322733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is a coded physical activity diary valid for assessing physical activity level and energy expenditure in stroke patients?
Vanroy C; Vanlandewijck Y; Cras P; Feys H; Truijen S; Michielsen M; Vissers D
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e98735. PubMed ID: 24905345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
