334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24280172)
1. Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis versus conventional Le Fort III osteotomy in correction of syndromic midfacial hypoplasia: a systematic review.
Saltaji H; Altalibi M; Major MP; Al-Nuaimi MH; Tabbaa S; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 May; 72(5):959-72. PubMed ID: 24280172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rigid External Distractor Aided Conventional Le Fort III Osteotomy Advancement in Adult With Severe Midfacial Hypoplasia.
Wang R; Liu C
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e59-62. PubMed ID: 26703038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complications in 54 frontofacial distraction procedures in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.
Goldstein JA; Paliga JT; Taylor JA; Bartlett SP
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 25569391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual midfacial distraction osteogenesis: Le Fort III minus I and Le Fort I for syndromic craniosynostosis.
Satoh K; Mitsukawa N; Hosaka Y
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Mar; 111(3):1019-28. PubMed ID: 12621171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modified Le Fort III osteotomy: A simple solution to severe midfacial hypoplasia.
Fariña R; Valladares S; Raposo A; Silva F
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 46(5):837-843. PubMed ID: 29636276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rotation advancement of the midface by distraction osteogenesis.
Denny AD; Kalantarian B; Hanson PR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 May; 111(6):1789-99; discussion 1800-3. PubMed ID: 12711938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Le Fort IV + I distraction osteogenesis using an internal device for syndromic craniosynostosis.
Sakamoto Y; Nakajima H; Tamada I; Sakamoto T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):788-95. PubMed ID: 24280175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sutural distraction osteogenesis (SDO) versus osteotomy distraction osteogenesis (ODO) for midfacial advancement: a new technique and primary clinical report.
Liu C; Hou M; Liang L; Huang X; Zhang T; Zhang H; Ma X; Song R
J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 16(4):537-48. PubMed ID: 16077296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advancement of the midface, from conventional Le Fort III osteotomy to Le Fort III distraction: review of the literature.
Nout E; Cesteleyn LL; van der Wal KG; van Adrichem LN; Mathijssen IM; Wolvius EB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 37(9):781-9. PubMed ID: 18486452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Midface distraction following Le Fort III and monobloc osteotomies: problems and solutions.
Gosain AK; Santoro TD; Havlik RJ; Cohen SR; Holmes RE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 May; 109(6):1797-808. PubMed ID: 11994576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Midface correction in patients with Crouzon syndrome is Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with a rigid external distraction device the gold standard?
Engel M; Berger M; Hoffmann J; Kühle R; Rückschloss T; Ristow O; Freudlsperger C; Kansy K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 47(3):420-430. PubMed ID: 30642732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perinasal Osteotomy With Distraction Osteogenesis for a Mild Syndromic Craniosynostosis.
Kobayashi S; Fukawa T; Yasumura K; Satake T; Maegawa J
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 30(1):50-52. PubMed ID: 30418289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with an external device in syndromic craniosynostosis.
Wery MF; Nada RM; van der Meulen JJ; Wolvius EB; Ongkosuwito EM
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 53(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 25605236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Respiratory outcome of midface advancement with distraction: a comparison between Le Fort III and frontofacial monobloc.
Mathijssen I; Arnaud E; Marchac D; Mireau E; Morisseau-Durand MP; Guérin P; Renier D
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 17(4):642-4. PubMed ID: 16877907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Midfacial advancement by bone distraction for treatment of craniofacial deformities.
Alonso N; Munhoz AM; Fogaça W; Ferreira MC
J Craniofac Surg; 1998 Mar; 9(2):114-8; discussion 119-22. PubMed ID: 9586537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distraction osteogenesis and its application to the midface and bony orbit in craniosynostosis syndromes.
Toth BA; Kim JW; Chin M; Cedars M
J Craniofac Surg; 1998 Mar; 9(2):100-13; discussion 119-22. PubMed ID: 9586536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of midfacial distraction on the obstructed airway in patients with syndromic bilateral coronal synostosis.
Nelson TE; Mulliken JB; Padwa BL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 66(11):2318-21. PubMed ID: 18940499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined push-pull distraction for correction of syndromic midfacial hypoplasia.
Schulten A; Lim AA; Bruun RA; Hayes C; Mulliken JB; Padwa BL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 64(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 16360853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The assessment of midface distraction osteogenesis in treatment of upper airway obstruction.
Xu H; Yu Z; Mu X
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1876-81. PubMed ID: 19816368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Consolidation Time and Relapse: A Systematic Review of Outcomes in Internal versus External Midface Distraction for Syndromic Craniosynostosis.
Bertrand AA; Lipman KJ; Bradley JP; Reidhead J; Lee JC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Nov; 144(5):1125-1134. PubMed ID: 31385890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
