These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24280770)

  • 1. Predictive capacity of risk assessment scales and clinical judgment for pressure ulcers: a meta-analysis.
    García-Fernández FP; Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL; Agreda JJ
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 24280770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales.
    Gurkan A; Kirtil I; Aydin YD; Kutuk G
    J Wound Care; 2022 Feb; 31(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35148625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
    Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of three commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales.
    O'Tuathail C; Taqi R
    Br J Nurs; 2011 Mar 24-Apr 14; 20(6):S27-8, S30, S32 Passim. PubMed ID: 21471902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care units: Comparison of the reliability and predictive validity of the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin scales.
    Adibelli S; Korkmaz F
    J Clin Nurs; 2019 Dec; 28(23-24):4595-4605. PubMed ID: 31491054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.
    Jun Seongsook RN; Jeong Ihnsook RN; Lee Younghee RN
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14725784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review.
    Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL; Garcia-Fernandez FP; Lopez-Medina IM; Alvarez-Nieto C
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Apr; 54(1):94-110. PubMed ID: 16553695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta-Analysis.
    Wei M; Wu L; Chen Y; Fu Q; Chen W; Yang D
    Nurs Crit Care; 2020 May; 25(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 31985893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Turkish Nurses' Opinions of the Braden and Waterlow Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scales: A Descriptive Pilot Study.
    Avsar P; Karadag A
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Feb; 62(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 26901388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: a replication study.
    Gould D; Goldstone L; Kelly D; Gammon J
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Mar; 41(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 14967190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale, Norton Scale, and Waterlow Scale in the Czech Republic.
    Šateková L; Žiaková K; Zeleníková R
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 27874258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Injury Risk Scales in Trauma-Surgery ICU Patients.
    Higgins J; Casey S; Taylor E; Wilson R; Halcomb P
    Crit Care Nurse; 2020 Dec; 40(6):52-61. PubMed ID: 33257967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care.
    Chen HL; Shen WQ; Liu P
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Sep; 62(9):20-8. PubMed ID: 27668477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Scales- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Park SH; Lee HS
    Iran J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 45(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 27114977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (Conscious level, Mobility, Haemodynamics, Oxygenation, Nutrition) Index with three scales.
    Fulbrook P; Anderson A
    J Adv Nurs; 2016 Mar; 72(3):680-92. PubMed ID: 26462998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Critical Evaluation of the Jackson/Cubbin Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale - A Secondary Analysis of a Retrospective Cohort Study Population of Intensive Care Patients.
    Ahtiala MH; Soppi E; Kivimäki R
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Feb; 62(2):24-33. PubMed ID: 26901387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales.
    Defloor T; Grypdonck MF
    J Clin Nurs; 2005 Mar; 14(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 15707448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for assessing risk of developing pressure ulcers and dependence-related lesions.
    Roca-Biosca A; Rubio-Rico L; Fernández MIM; Grau NG; Garijo GT; Fernández FPG
    J Wound Care; 2017 Sep; 26(9):528-536. PubMed ID: 28880761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the predictive validity of the Braden and Waterlow scales in intensive care unit patients: A multicentre study.
    Tao H; Zhang H; Ma Y; Lv L; Pei J; Jiao Y; Han L
    J Clin Nurs; 2024 May; 33(5):1809-1819. PubMed ID: 38031387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.