These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24280770)

  • 21. Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Tools for Elderly: A Meta-Analysis.
    Park SH; Lee YS; Kwon YM
    West J Nurs Res; 2016 Apr; 38(4):459-83. PubMed ID: 26337859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Norton, Waterlow, Braden, and Care Dependency Scales: comparing their validity when identifying patients' pressure sore risk.
    Balzer K; Pohl C; Dassen T; Halfens R
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2007; 34(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 17667085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers: a methodological review.
    Papanikolaou P; Lyne P; Anthony D
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Feb; 44(2):285-96. PubMed ID: 17141782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Challenge of Predicting Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Cohort Study.
    Ranzani OT; Simpson ES; Japiassú AM; Noritomi DT;
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1775-1783. PubMed ID: 27463839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of Braden Q, Garvin and Glamorgan risk assessment scales in paediatrics.
    Anthony D; Willock J; Baharestani M
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Aug; 19(3):98-105. PubMed ID: 20421164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predictive Validity of the Cubbin-Jackson and Braden Skin Risk Tools in Critical Care Patients: A Multisite Project.
    Delawder JM; Leontie SL; Maduro RS; Morgan MK; Zimbro KS
    Am J Crit Care; 2021 Mar; 30(2):140-144. PubMed ID: 33644804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk: a meta-analysis].
    Park SH; Park YS
    J Korean Acad Nurs; 2014 Dec; 44(6):595-607. PubMed ID: 25608538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predictive validity of Waterlow Scale for pressure ulcer development risk in hospitalized patients.
    Serpa LF; de Gouveia Santos VL; Gomboski G; Rosado SM
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2009; 36(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 19920745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An evaluation of the Waterlow pressure ulcer risk-assessment tool.
    Thompson D
    Br J Nurs; 2005 Apr 28-May 11; 14(8):455-9. PubMed ID: 15924028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Inter-rater reliability of three most commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in clinical practice.
    Wang LH; Chen HL; Yan HY; Gao JH; Wang F; Ming Y; Lu L; Ding JJ
    Int Wound J; 2015 Oct; 12(5):590-4. PubMed ID: 25224688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Sunderland Scale and the Cubbin & Jackson Revised Scale in Portuguese.
    Sousa B
    Rev Bras Ter Intensiva; 2013; 25(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 23917975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Risk Assessment Tool for Pressure Ulcer Development in Indian Surgical Wards.
    Kumari S; Sharma D; Rana A; Pathak R; Lal R; Kumar A; Biswal UC
    Indian J Surg; 2015 Jun; 77(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 26246703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Validity study of the current risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in intensive care (EVARUCI)].
    González-Ruiz JM; Núñez-Méndez P; Balugo-Huertas S; Navarro-de la Peña L; García-Martín MR
    Enferm Intensiva; 2008; 19(3):123-29, quiz 130-1. PubMed ID: 18840327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Validation of EMINA and EVARUCI scales for assessing the risk of developing pressure ulcers in critical patients].
    Roca-Biosca A; Garcia-Fernandez FP; Chacon-Garcés S; Rubio-Rico L; Olona-Cabases M; Anguera-Saperas L; Garcia-Grau N; Tuset-Garijo G; de Molina-Fernández I; Velasco-Guillen MC
    Enferm Intensiva; 2015; 26(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 25600461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predicting pressure ulcer risk: comparing the predictive validity of 4 scales.
    Jalali R; Rezaie M
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2005 Mar; 18(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 15788914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predictive validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the risk assessment pressure sore scale in intensive care patients: results of a prospective study.
    Günes ÜY; Efteli E
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2015 Apr; 61(4):58-62. PubMed ID: 25853378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validation and clinical impact of paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: A systematic review.
    Kottner J; Hauss A; Schlüer AB; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2013 Jun; 50(6):807-18. PubMed ID: 21645897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Braden Scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: a meta-analysis.
    He W; Liu P; Chen HL
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2012 Feb; 58(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 22316631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Value of pressure injury assessment scales for patients in the intensive care unit: Systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
    Zhang Y; Zhuang Y; Shen J; Chen X; Wen Q; Jiang Q; Lao Y
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2021 Jun; 64():103009. PubMed ID: 33640238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
    Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.