These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24282401)

  • 1. Hierarchical vector auto-regressive models and their applications to multi-subject effective connectivity.
    Gorrostieta C; Fiecas M; Ombao H; Burke E; Cramer S
    Front Comput Neurosci; 2013; 7():159. PubMed ID: 24282401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating brain connectivity using mixed effects vector autoregressive models.
    Gorrostieta C; Ombao H; Bédard P; Sanes JN
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(4):3347-55. PubMed ID: 22001164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Hierarchical Bayesian Model for Differential Connectivity in Multi-trial Brain Signals.
    Hu L; Guindani M; Fortin NJ; Ombao H
    Econom Stat; 2020 Jul; 15():117-135. PubMed ID: 33163735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vector Auto-Regressive Deep Neural Network: A Data-Driven Deep Learning-Based Directed Functional Connectivity Estimation Toolbox.
    Okuno T; Woodward A
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():764796. PubMed ID: 34899167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Unified Estimation Framework for State-Related Changes in Effective Brain Connectivity.
    Samdin SB; Ting CM; Ombao H; Salleh SH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Apr; 64(4):844-858. PubMed ID: 27323355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian vector autoregressive model for multi-subject effective connectivity inference using multi-modal neuroimaging data.
    Chiang S; Guindani M; Yeh HJ; Haneef Z; Stern JM; Vannucci M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Mar; 38(3):1311-1332. PubMed ID: 27862625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting individual brain functional connectivity using a Bayesian hierarchical model.
    Dai T; Guo Y;
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():772-787. PubMed ID: 27915121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding the Impact of Stroke on Brain Motor Function: A Hierarchical Bayesian Approach.
    Yu Z; Prado R; Quinlan EB; Cramer SC; Ombao H
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2016; 111(514):549-563. PubMed ID: 28138206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian modeling of dependence in brain connectivity data.
    Chen S; Xing Y; Kang J; Kochunov P; Hong LE
    Biostatistics; 2020 Apr; 21(2):269-286. PubMed ID: 30203093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-subject hierarchical inverse covariance modelling improves estimation of functional brain networks.
    Colclough GL; Woolrich MW; Harrison SJ; Rojas López PA; Valdes-Sosa PA; Smith SM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():370-384. PubMed ID: 29746906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resting state networks in empirical and simulated dynamic functional connectivity.
    Glomb K; Ponce-Alvarez A; Gilson M; Ritter P; Deco G
    Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():388-402. PubMed ID: 28782678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-subject Stochastic Blockmodels for adaptive analysis of individual differences in human brain network cluster structure.
    Pavlović DM; Guillaume BRL; Towlson EK; Kuek NMY; Afyouni S; Vértes PE; Yeo BTT; Bullmore ET; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 220():116611. PubMed ID: 32058004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Joint Structural Break Detection and Parameter Estimation in High-Dimensional Non-Stationary VAR Models.
    Safikhani A; Shojaie A
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2022; 117(537):251-264. PubMed ID: 38375186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. BVAR-Connect: A Variational Bayes Approach to Multi-Subject Vector Autoregressive Models for Inference on Brain Connectivity Networks.
    Kook JH; Vaughn KA; DeMaster DM; Ewing-Cobbs L; Vannucci M
    Neuroinformatics; 2021 Jan; 19(1):39-56. PubMed ID: 32504259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Penalized estimation of threshold auto-regressive models with many components and thresholds.
    Zhang K; Safikhani A; Tank A; Shojaie A
    Electron J Stat; 2022; 16(1):1891-1951. PubMed ID: 37051046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective connectivity and intersubject variability: using a multisubject network to test differences and commonalities.
    Mechelli A; Penny WD; Price CJ; Gitelman DR; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2002 Nov; 17(3):1459-69. PubMed ID: 12414285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Joint Bayesian Estimation of Voxel Activation and Inter-regional Connectivity in fMRI Experiments.
    Spencer D; Guhaniyogi R; Prado R
    Psychometrika; 2020 Dec; 85(4):845-869. PubMed ID: 32949345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variational Bayesian Approach for Causality and Contemporaneous Correlation Features Inference in Industrial Process Data.
    Raveendran R; Huang B
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2019 Jul; 49(7):2580-2590. PubMed ID: 29994020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A stimulus-locked vector autoregressive model for slow event-related fMRI designs.
    Thompson WK; Siegle G
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jul; 46(3):739-48. PubMed ID: 19236927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying functional connectivity in multi-subject fMRI data using component models.
    Madsen KH; Churchill NW; Mørup M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Feb; 38(2):882-899. PubMed ID: 27739635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.