These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24283855)

  • 1. Inpatient preanalytic process improvements.
    Wagar EA; Phipps R; Del Guidice R; Middleton LP; Bingham J; Prejean C; Johnson-Hamilton M; Philip P; Le NH; Muses W
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Dec; 137(12):1753-60. PubMed ID: 24283855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Lean principles to optimise inpatient phlebotomy services.
    Le RD; Melanson SE; Santos KS; Paredes JD; Baum JM; Goonan EM; Torrence-Hill JN; Gustafson ML; Tanasijevic MJ
    J Clin Pathol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):724-30. PubMed ID: 24821848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The laboratory is a key partner in assuring patient safety.
    Stankovic AK
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):1023-35. PubMed ID: 15555754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving preanalytic processes using the principles of lean production (Toyota Production System).
    Persoon TJ; Zaleski S; Frerichs J
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jan; 125(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 16482987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing preanalytical laboratory sample errors through educational and technological interventions.
    Lillo R; Salinas M; Lopez-Garrigos M; Naranjo-Santana Y; Gutiérrez M; Marín MD; Miralles M; Uris J
    Clin Lab; 2012; 58(9-10):911-7. PubMed ID: 23163106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A strategy for optimizing staffing to improve the timeliness of inpatient phlebotomy collections.
    Morrison AP; Tanasijevic MJ; Torrence-Hill JN; Goonan EM; Gustafson ML; Melanson SE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Dec; 135(12):1576-80. PubMed ID: 22129187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A quality improvement cycle: hemolyzed specimens in the emergency department.
    Pretlow L; Gandy T; Leibach EK; Russell B; Kraj B
    Clin Lab Sci; 2008; 21(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 19174982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three alternative structural configurations for phlebotomy: a comparison of effectiveness.
    Mannion H; Nadder T
    Clin Lab Sci; 2007; 20(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 18069445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
    Benedetto AR
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effects of the ISO 15189 accreditation on Nagoya University Hospital].
    Yoshiko K
    Rinsho Byori; 2012 Jul; 60(7):667-73. PubMed ID: 22973728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recentralizing phlebotomy back into the laboratory.
    Warner JL
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2005 Jul; 19(4):E3. PubMed ID: 16045821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phlebotomy issues and quality improvement in results of laboratory testing.
    Lippi G; Salvagno GL; Montagnana M; Franchini M; Guidi GC
    Clin Lab; 2006; 52(5-6):217-30. PubMed ID: 16812947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality in pathology laboratory practice.
    Weinstein S
    J Qual Clin Pract; 1995 Jun; 15(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7670717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the impact of a CD4+ T-cell testing laboratory improvement program.
    Rosner E; Siragusa M; Schalla W; Cross D; Cohn R; Hearn T
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 9625418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multidisciplinary, multifaceted improvement initiative to eliminate mislabelled laboratory specimens at a large tertiary care hospital.
    Seferian EG; Jamal S; Clark K; Cirricione M; Burnes-Bolton L; Amin M; Romanoff N; Klapper E
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Aug; 23(8):690-7. PubMed ID: 24915540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paradigm shift: phlebotomy belongs to nursing.
    Gable JT; Pyevac ZP
    Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1995; 9(4):286-8, 290-3, 296-7. PubMed ID: 10144343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inpatient phlebotomy practices. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes quality improvement study of 2,351,643 phlebotomy requests.
    Howanitz PJ; Schifman RB
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1994 Jun; 118(6):601-5. PubMed ID: 8204004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From customer satisfaction survey to corrective actions in laboratory services in a university hospital.
    Oja PI; Kouri TT; Pakarinen AJ
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2006 Dec; 18(6):422-8. PubMed ID: 17003077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing major identification errors within a deployed phlebotomy process.
    Bologna LJ; Lind C; Riggs RC
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2002; 16(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 11828783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applying Lean/Toyota production system principles to improve phlebotomy patient satisfaction and workflow.
    Melanson SE; Goonan EM; Lobo MM; Baum JM; Paredes JD; Santos KS; Gustafson ML; Tanasijevic MJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Dec; 132(6):914-9. PubMed ID: 19926584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.