501 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24283858)
1. Sampling modality influences the predictive value of grading in adult soft tissue extremity sarcomas.
Khoja H; Griffin A; Dickson B; Wunder J; Ferguson P; Howarth D; Kandel R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Dec; 137(12):1774-9. PubMed ID: 24283858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for soft tissue tumors].
Na J; Fang ZW; Zhao AL; Li JY
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 42(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 23769433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Federation Nationale des Centers de Lutte Contre le Cancer grading of soft tissue sarcomas on needle core biopsies using surrogate markers.
Lin X; Davion S; Bertsch EC; Omar I; Nayar R; Laskin WB
Hum Pathol; 2016 Oct; 56():147-54. PubMed ID: 27346575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between preoperative biopsy and post-excision histology results in sarcoma: experience at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Panda KG; Hale MJ; Kruger D; Luvhengo TE
S Afr J Surg; 2014 Jun; 52(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 25216095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic significance of grading and staging systems using MIB-1 score in adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk.
Hasegawa T; Yamamoto S; Yokoyama R; Umeda T; Matsuno Y; Hirohashi S
Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(4):843-51. PubMed ID: 12209729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: from histological to molecular assessment.
Neuville A; Chibon F; Coindre JM
Pathology; 2014 Feb; 46(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 24378389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histopathological re-classification of extremity pleomorphic soft tissue sarcoma has clinical relevance.
Massi D; Beltrami G; Capanna R; Franchi A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 30(10):1131-6. PubMed ID: 15522563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical significance of pretreatment serum C-reactive protein level in soft tissue sarcoma.
Nakamura T; Matsumine A; Matsubara T; Asanuma K; Uchida A; Sudo A
Cancer; 2012 Feb; 118(4):1055-61. PubMed ID: 21761398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Retrospective analysis and prognostic factors of 208 cases of primary soft tissue sarcoma of extremity].
Li Y; Niu XH; Xu HR
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 49(11):964-9. PubMed ID: 22333413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term recurrence of soft tissue sarcomas: prognostic factors and implications for prolonged follow-up.
Toulmonde M; Le Cesne A; Mendiboure J; Blay JY; Piperno-Neumann S; Chevreau C; Delcambre C; Penel N; Terrier P; Ranchère-Vince D; Lae M; Le Guellec S; Michels JJ; Robin YM; Bellera C; Italiano A
Cancer; 2014 Oct; 120(19):3003-6. PubMed ID: 24942887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Percutaneous core needle biopsy in retroperitoneal sarcomas does not influence local recurrence or overall survival.
Wilkinson MJ; Martin JL; Khan AA; Hayes AJ; Thomas JM; Strauss DC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):853-8. PubMed ID: 25190132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonrhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcomas of childhood: formulation of a simplified system for grading.
Parham DM; Webber BL; Jenkins JJ; Cantor AB; Maurer HM
Mod Pathol; 1995 Sep; 8(7):705-10. PubMed ID: 8539226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation and adaptation of a nomogram for predicting the survival of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma using a three-grade system.
Mariani L; Miceli R; Kattan MW; Brennan MF; Colecchia M; Fiore M; Casali PG; Gronchi A
Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(2):402-8. PubMed ID: 15578681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic significance of bcl-2, c-myc, survivin and tumor grade in synovial sarcoma.
Demır D; Yaman B; Anacak Y; Keçecı B; Kandıloğlu G; Akalin T
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2014; 30(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 24448706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Grading in soft tissue tumors: principles and problems.
Oliveira AM; Nascimento AG
Skeletal Radiol; 2001 Oct; 30(10):543-59. PubMed ID: 11685477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic value of necrosis after neoadjuvant therapy for soft tissue sarcoma.
Vaynrub M; Taheri N; Ahlmann ER; Yao C; Fedenko AN; Allison DC; Chawla SP; Menendez LR
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 111(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 25175933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of cytological grading of spindle-cell sarcomas.
Mathur S; Kapila K; Verma K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Aug; 29(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 12889044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sarcomas of the extremities and the pelvis: comparing local recurrence after incisional and after core-needle biopsy.
Klein A; Birkenmaier C; Fromm J; Knösel T; Di Gioia D; Dürr HR
World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 20(1):14. PubMed ID: 35016693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Follow-up after primary treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of extremities: impact of frequency of follow-up imaging on disease-specific survival.
Chou YS; Liu CY; Chen WM; Chen TH; Chen PC; Wu HT; Chiou HJ; Shiau CY; Wu YC; Liu CL; Chao TC; Tzeng CH; Yen CC
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Aug; 106(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 22297812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of clinicopathologic prognostic factors for 157 uterine sarcomas and evaluation of a grading score validated for soft tissue sarcoma.
Pautier P; Genestie C; Rey A; Morice P; Roche B; Lhommé C; Haie-Meder C; Duvillard P
Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(6):1425-31. PubMed ID: 10717626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
