These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24284848)

  • 1. In response to paresthesia coverage for comparing the inhibition of somatosensory evoked potentials by spinal cord stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
    Wolter T; Gierthmuehlen M
    Pain Physician; 2013; 16(6):E802-3. PubMed ID: 24284848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Paresthesia coverage for comparing the inhibition of somatosensory evoked potentials by spinal cord stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
    Buonocore M
    Pain Physician; 2013; 16(6):E801-2. PubMed ID: 24284863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spinal cord stimulation inhibits cortical somatosensory evoked potentials significantly stronger than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
    Wolter T; Kieselbach K; Sircar R; Gierthmuehlen M
    Pain Physician; 2013; 16(4):405-14. PubMed ID: 23877457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of spinal transcutaneous direct current stimulation on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans.
    Cogiamanian F; Vergari M; Pulecchi F; Marceglia S; Priori A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Nov; 119(11):2636-40. PubMed ID: 18786856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Akyüz G; Güven Z; Ozaras N; Kayhan O
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Oct; 35(6):371-6. PubMed ID: 8785935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Percutaneous sciatic somatosensory evoked potential. A comparison to the transcutaneous response.
    Bamford CR; Graeme K
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Dec; 34(8):491-4. PubMed ID: 7882892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cortical activity after stimulation of the corticospinal tract in the spinal cord.
    Costa P; Deletis V
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1726-1733. PubMed ID: 26679418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraoperative recordings of spinal somatosensory evoked potentials to tibial nerve and sural nerve stimulation.
    Pelosi L; Caruso G; Cracco RQ; Cracco JB; Balbi P
    Muscle Nerve; 1991 Mar; 14(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 2041546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spinal intramedullary recording of human somatosensory evoked potentials.
    Urasaki E; Wada S; Kadoya C; Yokata A; Matsuoka S
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 1691976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of desflurane on spinal somatosensory-evoked potentials and conductive spinal cord evoked potential.
    Jou IM; Chern TC; Chen TY; Tsai YC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1845-50. PubMed ID: 12923473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Posterior tibial somatosensory evoked potentials a comparative study of responses elicited by transcutaneous and percutaneous stimulation at the popliteal fossa.
    Bamford CR; Graeme K; Guthkelch AN; Dzioba R
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Dec; 35(8):463-9. PubMed ID: 8773206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Interference Effects on Somatosensory Evoked Potential from Tonic, Burst, and High-dose Spinal Cord Stimulations.
    Urasaki E; Miyagi Y; Muramatsu S; Ezaki Y
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2022 Jul; 62(7):313-321. PubMed ID: 35545502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of paired transcutaneous electrical stimulation delivered at single and dual sites over lumbosacral spinal cord.
    Sayenko DG; Atkinson DA; Floyd TC; Gorodnichev RM; Moshonkina TR; Harkema SJ; Edgerton VR; Gerasimenko YP
    Neurosci Lett; 2015 Nov; 609():229-34. PubMed ID: 26453766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Somatosensory evoked potentials in arteriopathy patients treated with electrostimulation of the posterior cord].
    De Vito L; Di Massa A; Setacci C; Diele G; Bonelli G; Nardini M; Battistini N; Paradiso C
    Minerva Anestesiol; 1990 Oct; 56(10):1183-6. PubMed ID: 2290536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spinal cord stimulation paresthesia and activity of primary afferents.
    North RB; Streelman K; Rowland L; Foreman PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Oct; 17(4):363-6. PubMed ID: 22900508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evoked potentials induced by transcranial stimulation in dogs.
    Kraus KH; O'Brien D; Pope ER; Kraus BH
    Am J Vet Res; 1990 Nov; 51(11):1732-5. PubMed ID: 2240797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [New trends in clinical neurophysiology of the spinal cord (review of the literature)].
    Zenkov LR; Zakhidov AIa; Toropina GG; Paramonov LV; Klishevskaia LA
    Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 1991; 91(10):109-13. PubMed ID: 1665637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects from lumbar nerve root transection in rats on spinal somatosensory and motor-evoked potentials.
    Jou IM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jan; 29(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 14722405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The cervical somatosensory evoked potential in lesions of the cortical efferents].
    Strenge H
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1990 Mar; 21(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 2110891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety versus efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the generation of motor-evoked potentials in the rat.
    Sabato S; Agresta CA; Freeman GM; Salzman SK
    J Neurotrauma; 1991; 8(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 2072400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.