These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2428593)

  • 1. Apparent response incompatibility effects on P3 latency depend on the task.
    Pfefferbaum A; Christensen C; Ford JM; Kopell BS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Nov; 64(5):424-37. PubMed ID: 2428593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of stimulus-response incompatibility on P3 latency depends on the task but not on age.
    Christensen CA; Ford JM; Pfefferbaum A
    Biol Psychol; 1996 Oct; 44(2):121-41. PubMed ID: 8913525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Manipulation of P3 latency: speed vs. accuracy instructions.
    Pfefferbaum A; Ford J; Johnson R; Wenegrat B; Kopell BS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1983 Feb; 55(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 6185317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERPs to response production and inhibition.
    Pfefferbaum A; Ford JM; Weller BJ; Kopell BS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1985 May; 60(5):423-34. PubMed ID: 2580694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: a psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow.
    Smid HG; Mulder G; Mulder LJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Aug; 74(2-3):169-201. PubMed ID: 2251928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of perceptual and cognitive difficulty on P3 and RT in young and old adults.
    Ford JM; Pfefferbaum A; Tinklenberg JR; Kopell BS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1982 Sep; 54(3):311-21. PubMed ID: 6179758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain potentials in a memory-scanning task. II. Effects of aging on potentials to the probes.
    Pratt H; Michalewski HJ; Patterson JV; Starr A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989 Jun; 72(6):507-17. PubMed ID: 2471620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ERPs to stimuli requiring response production and inhibition: effects of age, probability and visual noise.
    Pfefferbaum A; Ford JM
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 71(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 2446846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An investigation of hemispheric asymmetry in size and semantic discriminations and related visual ERPs.
    Juszczak NM; Andreassi JL
    Int J Neurosci; 1985 Aug; 27(3-4):283-97. PubMed ID: 4044137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Language-Related ERPs: Scalp Distributions and Modulation by Word Type and Semantic Priming.
    Nobre AC; McCarthy G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1994; 6(3):233-55. PubMed ID: 23964974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word position affects stimulus recognition: evidence for early ERP short-term plastic modulation.
    Spironelli C; Galfano G; Umiltà C; Angrilli A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Dec; 82(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 21924299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Late positive ERP peaks observed in stimulus-response compatibility tasks tested under speed-accuracy instructions.
    Christensen CA; Ivkovich D; Drake KJ
    Psychophysiology; 2001 May; 38(3):404-16. PubMed ID: 11352129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of covert attention and stimulus complexity on the P3 response during an auditory continuous performance task.
    Shucard DW; Abara JP; McCabe DC; Benedict RB; Shucard JL
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Nov; 54(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 15331213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognition potential latency and word image degradation.
    Rudell AP; Hua J
    Brain Lang; 1995 Nov; 51(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 8564470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. P300 habituation from visual stimuli?
    Geisler MW; Polich J
    Physiol Behav; 1994 Sep; 56(3):511-6. PubMed ID: 7972401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Central processing overlap modulates P3 latency.
    Dell'acqua R; Jolicoeur P; Vespignani F; Toffanin P
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 165(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 15827737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. P3 reduction in auditory evoked potentials of schizophrenics.
    Roth WT; Pfefferbaum A; Horvath TB; Berger PA; Kopell BS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Sep; 49(5-6):497-505. PubMed ID: 6158431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of negatively valenced words on deviant P3 during the three-stimulus oddball paradigm.
    Ishida M; Kaneda M; Akamine A; Sakakibara M
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Sep; 683():38-42. PubMed ID: 29906482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.