109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24286549)
1. [Influence of body mass index on the outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study].
Menzella D; Thubert T; Joubert M; Lauratet B; Kouchner P; Lefranc JP
Prog Urol; 2013 Dec; 23(17):1482-8. PubMed ID: 24286549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women.
Joubert M; Thubert T; Lefranc JP; Vaessen C; Chartier-Kastler É; Deffieux X; Rouprêt M
Prog Urol; 2014 Dec; 24(17):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25450756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Preliminary study on the feasibility of robot-assisted double mesh sacrocolpopexy in comparison to the laparoscopic approach].
Daher A; Renouvel F; Lauratet B; Guillot E; Lefranc JP
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Oct; 42(6):570-6. PubMed ID: 23972776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: quality of life and technique.
Mourik SL; Martens JE; Aktas M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 22897838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Double spinofixation laparoscopic versus laparoscopic robot-assisted: Morbidity, anatomical and functional short-term results].
Larue S; Meurette G; Lehur PA; Leveau E; Branchereau J; Bouchot O; Rigaud J
Prog Urol; 2011 Jul; 21(7):473-8. PubMed ID: 21693359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.
Elliott DS; Krambeck AE; Chow GK
J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):655-9. PubMed ID: 16813916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Robotic-assisted surgery in urogynecology--our experience with the first 100 cases: experience from a single institution].
Mustafa S; Mustafa M; Burke Y; Nibal AK; Deutsch M; Deutsch M; Lowenstein L
Harefuah; 2014 Aug; 153(8):448-52, 499. PubMed ID: 25286633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review.
Ganatra AM; Rozet F; Sanchez-Salas R; Barret E; Galiano M; Cathelineau X; Vallancien G
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1089-103. PubMed ID: 19201521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as management for pelvic organ prolapse.
Kramer BA; Whelan CM; Powell TM; Schwartz BF
J Endourol; 2009 Apr; 23(4):655-8. PubMed ID: 19335154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of the impact of body mass index on the surgical outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy.
George A; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(6):730-3. PubMed ID: 19896599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolaspe (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes.
Daneshgari F; Kefer JC; Moore C; Kaouk J
BJU Int; 2007 Oct; 100(4):875-9. PubMed ID: 17822467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Therapeutic effect of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Yin H; Zeng F; Xue M; Tian X
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Jun; 45(6):709-714. PubMed ID: 32879129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopy and body mass index: feasibility and outcome in obese patients treated for gynecologic diseases.
Camanni M; Bonino L; Delpiano EM; Migliaretti G; Berchialla P; Deltetto F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 20619751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.
Antosh DD; Grotzke SA; McDonald MA; Shveiky D; Park AJ; Gutman RE; Sokol AI
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22543767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of extreme obesity on outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Siedhoff MT; Carey ET; Findley AD; Riggins LE; Garrett JM; Steege JF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(6):701-7. PubMed ID: 23084673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: Sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse.
Elliott DS; Frank I; Dimarco DS; Chow GK
Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4A Suppl):52S-56S. PubMed ID: 15476652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
