These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24286549)

  • 21. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
    Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.
    Di Marco DS; Chow GK; Gettman MT; Elliott DS
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):373-6. PubMed ID: 14972496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detailed Cost Analysis of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Compared to Transvaginal Mesh Repair.
    Ehlert MJ; Gupta P; Park J; Sirls LT
    Urology; 2016 Nov; 97():86-91. PubMed ID: 27496298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese women: surgical technique and comparison with open surgery.
    Geppert B; Lönnerfors C; Persson J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Nov; 90(11):1210-7. PubMed ID: 21854364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cost analysis of open versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy.
    Hoyte L; Rabbanifard R; Mezzich J; Bassaly R; Downes K
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 23143426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes.
    Benway BM; Bhayani SB; Rogers CG; Dulabon LM; Patel MN; Lipkin M; Wang AJ; Stifelman MD
    J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):866-72. PubMed ID: 19616229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 21458389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Short-term outcomes for super-super obese (BMI > or =60 kg/m2) patients undergoing weight loss surgery at a high-volume bariatric surgery center: laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic gastric bypass, and open tubular gastric bypass.
    Stephens DJ; Saunders JK; Belsley S; Trivedi A; Ewing DR; Iannace V; Capella RF; Wasielewski A; Moran S; Schmidt HJ; Ballantyne GH
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2008; 4(3):408-15. PubMed ID: 18243060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Higgs PJ; Chua HL; Smith AR
    BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1134-8. PubMed ID: 16045530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Robot-assisted laparoscopy in the management of recurrent pelvic cancer].
    Jauffret C; Lambaudie E; Bannier M; Buttarelli M; Houvenaeghel G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011 Dec; 39(12):674-80. PubMed ID: 21871833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A prospective study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse.
    North CE; Ali-Ross NS; Smith AR; Reid FM
    BJOG; 2009 Aug; 116(9):1251-7. PubMed ID: 19485988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Outcomes and feasibility of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy among obese versus non-obese women.
    Thubert T; Naveau A; Letohic A; Villefranque V; Benifla JL; Deffieux X
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 120(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 23044008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laparoscopic pectopexy: a randomised comparative clinical trial of standard laparoscopic sacral colpo-cervicopexy to the new laparoscopic pectopexy. Short-term postoperative results.
    Noé KG; Spüntrup C; Anapolski M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Feb; 287(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 22945837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy.
    Delaney CP; Pokala N; Senagore AJ; Casillas S; Kiran RP; Brady KM; Fazio VW
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 May; 48(5):975-81. PubMed ID: 15793638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Geller EJ; Siddiqui NY; Wu JM; Visco AG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 112(6):1201-1206. PubMed ID: 19037026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences.
    Pulliam SJ; Weinstein MM; Wakamatsu MM
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 22453324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.
    Perrenot C; Germain A; Scherrer ML; Ayav A; Brunaud L; Bresler L
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jul; 56(7):909-14. PubMed ID: 23739199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy on symptoms, health-related quality of life and sexuality: a medium-term analysis.
    Thibault F; Costa P; Thanigasalam R; Seni G; Brouzyine M; Cayzergues L; De Tayrac R; Droupy S; Wagner L
    BJU Int; 2013 Dec; 112(8):1143-9. PubMed ID: 24007194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
    Mohr CJ; Nadzam GS; Curet MJ
    Arch Surg; 2005 Aug; 140(8):779-86. PubMed ID: 16103289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for female genital organ prolapse: establishment of a learning curve.
    Akladios CY; Dautun D; Saussine C; Baldauf JJ; Mathelin C; Wattiez A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Apr; 149(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 20096499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.