105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24286729)
1. Breast density classification to reduce false positives in CADe systems.
Vállez N; Bueno G; Déniz O; Dorado J; Seoane JA; Pazos A; Pastor C
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Feb; 113(2):569-84. PubMed ID: 24286729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic breast parenchymal density classification integrated into a CADe system.
Bueno G; Vállez N; Déniz O; Esteve P; Rienda MA; Arias M; Pastor C
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 May; 6(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 20686927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Wu YT; Paramagul C; Zhang Y
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 17502255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. False-positive reduction in computer-aided mass detection using mammographic texture analysis and classification.
Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Kurek J; Swiderski B; Kruk M; Zagrouba E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 160():75-83. PubMed ID: 29728249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing false positives of microcalcification detection systems by removal of breast arterial calcifications.
Mordang JJ; Gubern-Mérida A; den Heeten G; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1676. PubMed ID: 27036566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A computer-aided diagnosis scheme of breast lesion classification using GLGLM and shape features: Combined-view and multi-classifiers.
Liang C; Bian Z; Lv W; Chen S; Zeng D; Ma J
Phys Med; 2018 Nov; 55():61-72. PubMed ID: 30471821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated detection of breast masses on mammograms using adaptive contrast enhancement and texture classification.
Petrick N; Chan HP; Wei D; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1685-96. PubMed ID: 8946366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of volumetric features for temporal comparison of mass lesions in full field digital mammograms.
Bozek J; Kallenberg M; Grgic M; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021902. PubMed ID: 24506623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of support vector machine classification for computer aided detection of breast masses in mammography.
Lesniak JM; Hupse R; Blanc R; Karssemeijer N; Székely G
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Aug; 57(16):5295-307. PubMed ID: 22853938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Learning from unbalanced data: a cascade-based approach for detecting clustered microcalcifications.
Bria A; Karssemeijer N; Tortorella F
Med Image Anal; 2014 Feb; 18(2):241-52. PubMed ID: 24292553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison Analysis of Linear Discriminant Analysis and Cuckoo-Search Algorithm in the Classification of Breast Cancer from Digital Mammograms.
S R SC; Rajaguru H
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Aug; 20(8):2333-2337. PubMed ID: 31450903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semiautomatic mammographic parenchymal patterns classification using multiple statistical features.
Castella C; Kinkel K; Eckstein MP; Sottas PE; Verdun FR; Bochud FO
Acad Radiol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):1486-99. PubMed ID: 18035278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Global parenchymal texture features based on histograms of oriented gradients improve cancer development risk estimation from healthy breasts.
Pérez-Benito FJ; Signol F; Pérez-Cortés JC; Pollán M; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Casals M; Martínez I; LLobet R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():123-132. PubMed ID: 31319940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving the accuracy in detection of clustered microcalcifications with a context-sensitive classification model.
Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):159. PubMed ID: 26745908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
