These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24286906)
1. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis. Akyalcin S; Dyer DJ; English JD; Sar C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):831-7. PubMed ID: 24286906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models. Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Registration accuracy in the integration of laser-scanned dental images into maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography images. Noh H; Nabha W; Cho JH; Hwang HS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 21967948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surface analysis of study models generated from OrthoCAD and cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Lightheart KG; English JD; Kau CH; Akyalcin S; Bussa HI; McGrory KR; McGrory KJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):686-93. PubMed ID: 22640670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of 3-dimensional curvilinear measurements on digital models with intraoral scanners. Mack S; Bonilla T; English JD; Cozad B; Akyalcin S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28863923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts. de Waard O; Rangel FA; Fudalej PS; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Breuning KH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Sousa MV; Vasconcelos EC; Janson G; Garib D; Pinzan A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 22858338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Mullen SR; Martin CA; Ngan P; Gladwin M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 17826603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models: Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner. Wan Hassan WN; Othman SA; Chan CS; Ahmad R; Ali SN; Abd Rohim A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):886-895. PubMed ID: 27871715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements. Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography. White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting first molar width using virtual models of dental arches. Lee SP; Delong R; Hodges JS; Hayashi K; Lee JB Clin Anat; 2008 Jan; 21(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 18092365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and reliability of tooth size and dental arch measurements: a stereo photogrammetric study. Al-Khatib AR; Rajion ZA; Masudi SM; Hassan R; Townsend GC Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22866590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor. Redlich M; Weinstock T; Abed Y; Schneor R; Holdstein Y; Fischer A Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images. Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. Hazeveld A; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 24373661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting tooth-size discrepancy: A new formula utilizing revised landmarks and 3-dimensional laser scanning technology. Bailey E; Nelson G; Miller AJ; Andrews L; Johnson E Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):574-85. PubMed ID: 23561420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of linear and angular dental measurements with the OrthoMechanics Sequential Analyzer. Talaat S; Kaboudan A; Breuning H; Ragy N; Elshebiny T; Kula K; Ghoneima A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 25636561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]