These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

509 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24286915)

  • 21. Point-based superimposition of a digital dental model on to a three-dimensional computed tomographic skull: an accuracy study in vitro.
    Lin X; Chen T; Liu J; Jiang T; Yu D; Shen SG
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 53(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25300890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements.
    Sousa MV; Vasconcelos EC; Janson G; Garib D; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 22858338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of cone beam computed tomography and a laser intraoral scanner in virtual dental implant surgery: part 1.
    Lee CY; Ganz SD; Wong N; Suzuki JB
    Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 22814549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The reliability of using postero-anterior cephalometry and cone-beam CT to determine transverse dimensions in clinical practice.
    Tai B; Goonewardene MS; Murray K; Koong B; Islam SM
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 Nov; 30(2):132-42. PubMed ID: 25549515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kim J; Heo G; Lagravère MO
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 23957664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models: Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner.
    Wan Hassan WN; Othman SA; Chan CS; Ahmad R; Ali SN; Abd Rohim A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):886-895. PubMed ID: 27871715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital replacement of the distorted dentition acquired by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a pilot study.
    Nairn NJ; Ayoub AF; Barbenel J; Moos K; Naudi K; Ju X; Khambay BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 42(11):1488-93. PubMed ID: 23644040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures.
    Kim TS; Caruso JM; Christensen H; Torabinejad M
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1191-4. PubMed ID: 20630297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Monitoring of typodont root movement via crown superimposition of single cone-beam computed tomography and consecutive intraoral scans.
    Lee RJ; Pham J; Choy M; Weissheimer A; Dougherty HL; Sameshima GT; Tong H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 24582031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Rangel FA; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Becking AG; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):721-7. PubMed ID: 20640463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
    Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of linear measurements and analyses taken from plaster models and three-dimensional images.
    Porto BG; Porto TS; Silva MB; Grehs RA; Pinto Ados S; Bhandi SH; Tonetto MR; Bandéca MC; dos Santos-Pinto LA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 25825090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images.
    Ludlow JB; Laster WS; See M; Bailey LJ; Hershey HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Apr; 103(4):534-42. PubMed ID: 17395068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing.
    Wesemann C; Muallah J; Mah J; Bumann A
    Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 27834416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
    Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance.
    Tai K; Hotokezaka H; Park JH; Tai H; Miyajima K; Choi M; Kai LM; Mishima K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Three-dimensional monitoring of root movement during orthodontic treatment.
    Lee RJ; Weissheimer A; Pham J; Go L; de Menezes LM; Redmond WR; Loos JF; Sameshima GT; Tong H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 25533080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.