353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24287683)
21. The correlation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cervical compression myelopathy with neurologic and radiologic severity.
Aota Y; Niwa T; Uesugi M; Yamashita T; Inoue T; Saito T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(7):814-20. PubMed ID: 18379411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Suda K; Abumi K; Ito M; Shono Y; Kaneda K; Fujiya M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1258-62. PubMed ID: 12811268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. High reliability and accuracy of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cervical Spondylotic myelopathy: a multicenter study.
Park WT; Min WK; Shin JH; Ko SB; Son ES; Kim J; Jang J; Lee GW
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Dec; 23(1):1107. PubMed ID: 36536358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Relationship of dynamic cord impingement with disease severity and prognosis in cervical spondylotic myelopathy].
Wang LF; Shen Y; Zhang YZ; Xu JX; Ding WY; Cao JM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 89(41):2883-7. PubMed ID: 20137642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Increased flow signal in compressed segments of the spinal cord in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Chang HS; Nejo T; Yoshida S; Oya S; Matsui T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Dec; 39(26):2136-42. PubMed ID: 25271503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of prognostic value of different MRI classifications of signal intensity change in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Avadhani A; Rajasekaran S; Shetty AP
Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):475-85. PubMed ID: 20494809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic X-ray's correlations with dynamic electrophysiological findings in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective cohort study.
Yu Z; Lin K; Chen J; Chen KH; Guo W; Dai Y; Chen Y; Zou X; Peng X
BMC Neurol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):367. PubMed ID: 33023483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Risk factors for missed dynamic canal stenosis in the cervical spine.
Hayashi T; Wang JC; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Scott TP; Phan K; Lord EL; Ruangchainikom M; Shiba K; Daubs MD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):812-9. PubMed ID: 24583725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Kinetic analysis of the cervical spinal cord in patients after spinous process-splitting laminoplasty using a kinematic magnetic resonance imaging technique.
Miyata K; Marui T; Miura J; Yoshiya S; Fujii M; Kurosaka M; Doita M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):E690-7. PubMed ID: 16946642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The value of dynamic MRI in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a protocol for a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Xu N; Zhang Y; Zhou G; Zhao Q; Wang S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Feb; 21(1):83. PubMed ID: 32033548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improve the Predictive Performance of a Validated Clinical Prediction Rule Developed to Evaluate Surgical Outcome in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy?
Nouri A; Tetreault L; Côté P; Zamorano JJ; Dalzell K; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(14):1092-100. PubMed ID: 25893357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The use of MR-myelography combining flexion and extension imaging in the diagnosis of cervical myelopathy: a case report.
Rosen CL; Orphanos JR; Nugent RG; Marano G
W V Med J; 2009; 105(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 19146040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.
Masaki Y; Yamazaki M; Okawa A; Aramomi M; Hashimoto M; Koda M; Mochizuki M; Moriya H
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 17285045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Karpova A; Arun R; Davis AM; Kulkarni AV; Massicotte EM; Mikulis DJ; Lubina ZI; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(5):392-400. PubMed ID: 23448898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical and MRI predictors of outcome after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Alafifi T; Kern R; Fehlings M
J Neuroimaging; 2007 Oct; 17(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 17894620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET in monosegmental stenosis and myelopathy of the cervical spinal cord.
Floeth FW; Stoffels G; Herdmann J; Eicker S; Galldiks N; Rhee S; Steiger HJ; Langen KJ
J Nucl Med; 2011 Sep; 52(9):1385-91. PubMed ID: 21852356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient and apparent diffusion tensor maps in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Demir A; Ries M; Moonen CT; Vital JM; Dehais J; Arne P; Caillé JM; Dousset V
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 14519868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Delayed resolution of extensive T2-weighted intramedullary signal changes after oblique corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Turel MK; Chacko AG
Br J Neurosurg; 2011 Dec; 25(6):772-4. PubMed ID: 21707301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prevalence of physical signs in cervical myelopathy: a prospective, controlled study.
Rhee JM; Heflin JA; Hamasaki T; Freedman B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):890-5. PubMed ID: 19352222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating horses with spinal ataxia.
Mitchell CW; Nykamp SG; Foster R; Cruz R; Montieth G
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 22533785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
