These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24289528)

  • 1. Acceptability of long-acting, progestin-only contraception in Europe: a two-year prospective, non-interventional study.
    Short M; Dallay D; Omokanye S; Stauch K; Inki P
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2014 Feb; 19(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 24289528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acceptability of the levonorgestrel releasing-intrauterine system and etonogestrel implant: one-year results of an observational study.
    Short M; Dallay D; Omokanye S; Hanisch JU; Inki P
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2012 Feb; 17(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 22200172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of intensive versus non-intensive counselling on discontinuation rates due to bleeding disturbances of three long-acting reversible contraceptives.
    Modesto W; Bahamondes MV; Bahamondes L
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1393-9. PubMed ID: 24812309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A three-year comparative study of continuation rates, bleeding patterns and satisfaction in Australian women using a subdermal contraceptive implant or progestogen releasing-intrauterine system.
    Weisberg E; Bateson D; McGeechan K; Mohapatra L
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2014 Feb; 19(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 24229367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A 12-month multicenter, randomized study comparing the levonorgestrel intrauterine system with the etonogestrel subdermal implant.
    Apter D; Briggs P; Tuppurainen M; Grunert J; Lukkari-Lax E; Rybowski S; Gemzell-Danielsson K
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):151-157.e5. PubMed ID: 27016644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system: cohort study to assess satisfaction in a postpartum population in Kenya.
    Hubacher D; Masaba R; Manduku CK; Chen M; Veena V
    Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 25601351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extended use up to 5 years of the etonogestrel-releasing subdermal contraceptive implant: comparison to levonorgestrel-releasing subdermal implant.
    Ali M; Akin A; Bahamondes L; Brache V; Habib N; Landoulsi S; Hubacher D;
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2491-2498. PubMed ID: 27671673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A 3-year multicentre randomized controlled trial of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants, with non-randomized matched copper-intrauterine device controls.
    Bahamondes L; Brache V; Meirik O; Ali M; Habib N; Landoulsi S;
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2527-38. PubMed ID: 26409014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in body composition in women using long-acting reversible contraception.
    Silva Dos Santos PN; Madden T; Omvig K; Peipert JF
    Contraception; 2017 Apr; 95(4):382-389. PubMed ID: 28041992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complications and continuation rates associated with 2 types of long-acting contraception.
    Berenson AB; Tan A; Hirth JM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):761.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25555662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two year continuation rates of contraceptive methods in France: a cohort study from the French national health insurance database.
    Agostini A; Godard C; Laurendeau C; Benmahmoud Zoubir A; Lafuma A; Lévy-Bachelot L; Gourmelen J; Linet T
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2018 Dec; 23(6):421-426. PubMed ID: 30499732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endometriosis-associated pain scores and biomarkers in users of the etonogestrel-releasing subdermal implant or the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for up to 24 months.
    Margatho D; Carvalho NM; Bahamondes L
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2020 Apr; 25(2):133-140. PubMed ID: 32069126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multicentre, open-label, randomised phase III study comparing a new levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive system (LNG-IUS 8) with combined oral contraception in young women of reproductive age.
    Borgatta L; Buhling KJ; Rybowski S; Roth K; Rosen K
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2016 Oct; 21(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 27494570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in continuation rates and early removal between contraceptive and therapeutic use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system 52 mg.
    Teunissen AM; Merry AHH; Devies IEC; Roumen FJME
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2019 Dec; 24(6):449-456. PubMed ID: 31696740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Weight change at 12 months in users of three progestin-only contraceptive methods.
    Vickery Z; Madden T; Zhao Q; Secura GM; Allsworth JE; Peipert JF
    Contraception; 2013 Oct; 88(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 23582238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimated disability-adjusted life years averted by long-term provision of long acting contraceptive methods in a Brazilian clinic.
    Bahamondes L; Bottura BF; Bahamondes MV; Gonçalves MP; Correia VM; Espejo-Arce X; Sousa MH; Monteiro I; Fernandes A
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Oct; 29(10):2163-70. PubMed ID: 25085802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-acting reversible contraceptive acceptability and unintended pregnancy among women presenting for short-acting methods: a randomized patient preference trial.
    Hubacher D; Spector H; Monteith C; Chen PL; Hart C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 216(2):101-109. PubMed ID: 27662799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of copper intrauterine device with levonorgestrel-bearing intrauterine system for post-abortion contraception.
    Bilgehan F; Dilbaz B; Karadag B; Deveci CD
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1426-32. PubMed ID: 26180028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Femilis LNG-IUS: contraceptive performance-an interim analysis.
    Wildemeersch D; Janssens D; Andrade A
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2009 Apr; 14(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 19340705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Twelve-month discontinuation rates of levonorgestrel intrauterine system 13.5 mg and subdermal etonogestrel implant in women aged 18-44: A retrospective claims database analysis.
    Law A; Liao L; Lin J; Yaldo A; Lynen R
    Contraception; 2018 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 29684326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.