663 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24289591)
1. Study protocol for the most effective recall method in a cervical cancer screening program in Klang, Malaysia.
Abdul Rashid RM; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5867-70. PubMed ID: 24289591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost effective analysis of recall methods for cervical cancer screening in Selangor--results from a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Rashid RM; Ramli S; John J; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(13):5143-7. PubMed ID: 25040965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is the phone call the most effective method for recall in cervical cancer screening?--results from a randomised control trial.
Abdul Rashid RM; Mohamed M; Hamid ZA; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5901-4. PubMed ID: 24289597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adapting the Australian system: is an organized screening program feasible in Malaysia?--an overview of cervical cancer screening in both countries.
Rashid RM; Dahlui M; Mohamed M; Gertig D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(3):2141-6. PubMed ID: 23679334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a worksite cervical screening initiative to increase Pap smear uptake in Malaysia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Abdullah F; O'Rorke M; Murray L; Su TT
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():572126. PubMed ID: 24073411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Participation in interventions and recommended follow-up for non-attendees in cervical cancer screening -taking the women's own preferred test method into account-A Swedish randomised controlled trial.
Lilliecreutz C; Karlsson H; Spetz Holm AC
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235202. PubMed ID: 32614875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A mobile unit: an effective service for cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Tatip Y; Boonmak C
Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Feb; 28(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10195661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Applying the Transtheoretical Model to evaluate the effect of a call-recall program in enhancing Pap smear practice: a cluster randomized trial.
Abdullah F; Su TT
Prev Med; 2013; 57 Suppl():S83-6. PubMed ID: 23415623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical cancer risk levels in Turkey and compliance to the national cervical cancer screening standard.
Açikgöz A; Ergör G
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):923-7. PubMed ID: 21790227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Awareness and knowledge regarding of cervical cancer, Pap smear screening and human papillomavirus infection in Gabonese women.
Assoumou SZ; Mabika BM; Mbiguino AN; Mouallif M; Khattabi A; Ennaji MM
BMC Womens Health; 2015 Apr; 15():37. PubMed ID: 25924940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors influencing the prevalence of cervical cancer screening in Malaysia: a nationwide survey.
Chan YM; Ismail MZH; Khaw WF
BMC Womens Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):389. PubMed ID: 37491253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors Affecting Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Among African Women in Klang Valley, Malaysia.
Nwabichie CC; Manaf RA; Ismail SB
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Mar; 19(3):825-831. PubMed ID: 29582641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.
Tavasoli SM; Pefoyo AJ; Hader J; Lee A; Kupets R
Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():230-6. PubMed ID: 27143497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring the feasibility of using mobile phones to improve the management of clients with cervical cancer precursor lesions.
Moodley J; Constant D; Botha MH; van der Merwe FH; Edwards A; Momberg M
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):2. PubMed ID: 30616579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical screening uptake and its predictors among rural women in Malaysia.
Gan DE; Dahlui M
Singapore Med J; 2013 Mar; 54(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 23546031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of a mobile unit on changes in knowledge and use of cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Lerdlukanavonge P; Koonchote S
Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Jun; 24(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 7672887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Probability of early repeat Pap smear in an integrated cervical screening programme.
Rosso A; Foglietta F; Naldoni C; Schincaglia P; Buzzi G; Camprincoli S; Serafini M; Busoli S; Leoni F; Grilli N; Bucchi L
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2000 Aug; 9(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 10958330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attitudes and factors affecting acceptability of self-administered cervicovaginal sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping as an alternative to Pap testing among multiethnic Malaysian women.
Ma'som M; Bhoo-Pathy N; Nasir NH; Bellinson J; Subramaniam S; Ma Y; Yap SH; Goh PP; Gravitt P; Woo YL
BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011022. PubMed ID: 27491667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
