180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24289597)
1. Is the phone call the most effective method for recall in cervical cancer screening?--results from a randomised control trial.
Abdul Rashid RM; Mohamed M; Hamid ZA; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5901-4. PubMed ID: 24289597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost effective analysis of recall methods for cervical cancer screening in Selangor--results from a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Rashid RM; Ramli S; John J; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(13):5143-7. PubMed ID: 25040965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Study protocol for the most effective recall method in a cervical cancer screening program in Klang, Malaysia.
Abdul Rashid RM; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5867-70. PubMed ID: 24289591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
Buehler SK; Parsons WL
CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 9294390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mailed Letter Versus Phone Call to Increase Uptake of Cancer Screening: A Pragmatic, Randomized Trial.
Kiran T; Davie S; Moineddin R; Lofters A
J Am Board Fam Med; 2018; 31(6):857-868. PubMed ID: 30413542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective randomised controlled trial of methods of call and recall for cervical cytology screening.
Pierce M; Lundy S; Palanisamy A; Winning S; King J
BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6692):160-2. PubMed ID: 2504359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applying the Transtheoretical Model to evaluate the effect of a call-recall program in enhancing Pap smear practice: a cluster randomized trial.
Abdullah F; Su TT
Prev Med; 2013; 57 Suppl():S83-6. PubMed ID: 23415623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Reminding Patients to Complete Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Automated and Live Approaches.
Coronado GD; Rivelli JS; Fuoco MJ; Vollmer WM; Petrik AF; Keast E; Barker S; Topalanchik E; Jimenez R
J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Jan; 33(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 29019046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stepwise strategy to improve Cervical Cancer Screening Adherence (SCAN-CC): automated text messages, phone calls and face-to-face interviews: protocol of a population-based randomised controlled trial.
Firmino-Machado J; Mendes R; Moreira A; Lunet N
BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017730. PubMed ID: 28982833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical Screening Reminders for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women in Primary Care-Randomised Controlled Trial of Letter vs. Phone/SMS Reminders.
Ivers R; Levett T; Wynn K
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jun; 20(13):. PubMed ID: 37444104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.
Tavasoli SM; Pefoyo AJ; Hader J; Lee A; Kupets R
Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():230-6. PubMed ID: 27143497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening.
Vogt TM; Glass A; Glasgow RE; La Chance PA; Lichtenstein E
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):789-98. PubMed ID: 14588129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring the feasibility of using mobile phones to improve the management of clients with cervical cancer precursor lesions.
Moodley J; Constant D; Botha MH; van der Merwe FH; Edwards A; Momberg M
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):2. PubMed ID: 30616579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Timely reminder interventions to improve annual Papanicolaou (Pap) smear rates among HIV-infected women in an outpatient center of southern Nevada: a short report.
Ganta V; Moonie S; Patel D; Hunt AT; Richardson J; Di John D; Ezeanolue EE
AIDS Care; 2017 Sep; 29(9):1099-1101. PubMed ID: 28460538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer.
Eaker S; Adami HO; Granath F; Wilander E; Sparén P
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Mar; 13(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 15006907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A 3-step intervention to improve adherence to cervical cancer screening: The SCAN randomized controlled trial.
Firmino-Machado J; Varela S; Mendes R; Moreira A; Lunet N;
Prev Med; 2019 Jun; 123():250-261. PubMed ID: 30936001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How reminders given to patients and physicians affected pap smear use in a health maintenance organization: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Burack RC; Gimotty PA; George J; McBride S; Moncrease A; Simon MS; Dews P; Coombs J
Cancer; 1998 Jun; 82(12):2391-400. PubMed ID: 9635532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stepwise strategy to improve cervical cancer screening adherence (SCAN-Cervical Cancer) - Automated text messages, phone calls and reminders: Population based randomized controlled trial.
Firmino-Machado J; Varela S; Mendes R; Moreira A; Lunet N;
Prev Med; 2018 Sep; 114():123-133. PubMed ID: 29894717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Text messages to increase attendance to follow-up cervical cancer screening appointments among HPV-positive Tanzanian women (Connected2Care): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Linde DS; Andersen MS; Mwaiselage JD; Manongi R; Kjaer SK; Rasch V
Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):555. PubMed ID: 29162148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increasing participation in cervical cancer screening: offering a HPV self-test to long-term non-attendees as part of RACOMIP, a Swedish randomized controlled trial.
Broberg G; Gyrd-Hansen D; Miao Jonasson J; Ryd ML; Holtenman M; Milsom I; Strander B
Int J Cancer; 2014 May; 134(9):2223-30. PubMed ID: 24127304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
