BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24289948)

  • 1. Evaluating the environmental impact of artificial sweeteners: a study of their distributions, photodegradation and toxicities.
    Sang Z; Jiang Y; Tsoi YK; Leung KS
    Water Res; 2014 Apr; 52():260-74. PubMed ID: 24289948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Degradation of artificial sweeteners via direct and indirect photochemical reactions.
    Perkola N; Vaalgamaa S; Jernberg J; Vähätalo AV
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Jul; 23(13):13288-97. PubMed ID: 27023816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photocatalytic transformation of acesulfame: Transformation products identification and embryotoxicity study.
    Li AJ; Schmitz OJ; Stephan S; Lenzen C; Yue PY; Li K; Li H; Leung KS
    Water Res; 2016 Feb; 89():68-75. PubMed ID: 26630044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Saccharin and other artificial sweeteners in soils: estimated inputs from agriculture and households, degradation, and leaching to groundwater.
    Buerge IJ; Keller M; Buser HR; Müller MD; Poiger T
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(2):615-21. PubMed ID: 21142066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of two artificial sweeteners, cyclamate and acesulfame, to identify and quantify wastewater contributions in a karst spring.
    Zirlewagen J; Licha T; Schiperski F; Nödler K; Scheytt T
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Mar; 547():356-365. PubMed ID: 26795541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acesulfame and other artificial sweeteners in a wastewater treatment plant in Alberta, Canada: Occurrence, degradation, and emission.
    Qiao S; Huang W; Kuzma D; Kormendi A
    Chemosphere; 2024 May; 356():141893. PubMed ID: 38582168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sucralose and acesulfame as an indicator of domestic wastewater contamination in Wuhan surface water.
    Fu K; Wang L; Wei C; Li J; Zhang J; Zhou Z; Liang Y
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Feb; 189():109980. PubMed ID: 31785946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suitability of artificial sweeteners as indicators of raw wastewater contamination in surface water and groundwater.
    Tran NH; Hu J; Li J; Ong SL
    Water Res; 2014 Jan; 48():443-56. PubMed ID: 24156949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fate of artificial sweeteners in wastewater treatment plants in New York State, U.S.A.
    Subedi B; Kannan K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(23):13668-74. PubMed ID: 25365516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis and occurrence of seven artificial sweeteners in German waste water and surface water and in soil aquifer treatment (SAT).
    Scheurer M; Brauch HJ; Lange FT
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2009 Jul; 394(6):1585-94. PubMed ID: 19533103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Untreated wastewater impact and environmental risk assessment of artificial sweeteners in river water and sediments of the Danube River Basin in Serbia.
    Gvozdić E; Bujagić IM; Đurkić T; Grujić S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jul; 30(35):84583-84594. PubMed ID: 37368207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental Impact of the Presence, Distribution, and Use of Artificial Sweeteners as Emerging Sources of Pollution.
    Naik AQ; Zafar T; Shrivastava VK
    J Environ Public Health; 2021; 2021():6624569. PubMed ID: 33936216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antibiotics and sweeteners in the aquatic environment: biodegradability, formation of phototransformation products, and in vitro toxicity.
    Bergheim M; Gminski R; Spangenberg B; Debiak M; Bürkle A; Mersch-Sundermann V; Kümmerer K; Gieré R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Nov; 22(22):18017-30. PubMed ID: 26169816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calibration and field validation of POCIS passive samplers for tracking artificial sweeteners as indicators of municipal wastewater contamination in surface waters.
    Sultana T; Metcalfe CD
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jul; 194(8):564. PubMed ID: 35788916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Occurrence and removal of four artificial sweeteners in wastewater treatment plants of China.
    Shen G; Lei S; Li H; Yu Q; Wu G; Shi Y; Xu K; Ren H; Geng J
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2023 Jan; 25(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 36476784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. National wastewater reconnaissance of artificial sweetener consumption and emission in Australia.
    Li D; O'Brien JW; Tscharke BJ; Choi PM; Zheng Q; Ahmed F; Thompson J; Li J; Mueller JF; Sun H; Thomas KV
    Environ Int; 2020 Oct; 143():105963. PubMed ID: 32688159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artificial sweeteners--a recently recognized class of emerging environmental contaminants: a review.
    Lange FT; Scheurer M; Brauch HJ
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2012 Jul; 403(9):2503-18. PubMed ID: 22543693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artificial sweeteners as potential tracers of municipal landfill leachate.
    Roy JW; Van Stempvoort DR; Bickerton G
    Environ Pollut; 2014 Jan; 184():89-93. PubMed ID: 24041482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Degradation of sucralose in groundwater and implications for age dating contaminated groundwater.
    Robertson WD; Van Stempvoort DR; Spoelstra J; Brown SJ; Schiff SL
    Water Res; 2016 Jan; 88():653-660. PubMed ID: 26575474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ecotoxicity and environmental fates of newly recognized contaminants-artificial sweeteners: A review.
    Luo J; Zhang Q; Cao M; Wu L; Cao J; Fang F; Li C; Xue Z; Feng Q
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 653():1149-1160. PubMed ID: 30759555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.