300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24290312)
1. Characterization and prediction of rate-dependent flexibility in lumbar spine biomechanics at room and body temperature.
Stolworthy DK; Zirbel SA; Howell LL; Samuels M; Bowden AE
Spine J; 2014 May; 14(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 24290312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intervertebral disc degeneration alters lumbar spine segmental stiffness in all modes of loading under a compressive follower load.
Zirbel SA; Stolworthy DK; Howell LL; Bowden AE
Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1134-47. PubMed ID: 23507531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of obesity in the biomechanics and radiological changes of the spine: an in vitro study.
Rodriguez-Martinez NG; Perez-Orribo L; Kalb S; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Hughes J; Theodore N; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Apr; 24(4):615-23. PubMed ID: 26654342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Needle puncture in rabbit functional spinal units alters rotational biomechanics.
Hartman RA; Bell KM; Quan B; Nuzhao Y; Sowa GA; Kang JD
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Apr; 28(3):E146-53. PubMed ID: 25370985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical characteristics of different regions of the human spine: an in vitro study on multilevel spinal segments.
Busscher I; van Dieën JH; Kingma I; van der Veen AJ; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2858-64. PubMed ID: 20010393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lumbar lateral interbody cage with plate augmentation: in vitro biomechanical analysis.
Le Huec JC; Liu M; Skalli W; Josse L
Eur Spine J; 2002 Apr; 11(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 11956919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cumulative multiple freeze-thaw cycles and testing does not affect subsequent within-day variation in intervertebral flexibility of human cadaveric lumbosacral spine.
Tan JS; Uppuganti S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(20):E1238-42. PubMed ID: 22660554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Biomechanical stability of unilateral pedicle screw fixation on cadaveric model simulated two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion].
Dong JW; Feng F; Zhao WD; Rong LM; Liu XM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 May; 49(5):436-9. PubMed ID: 21733402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the torsional stiffness of the lumbar spine in flexion and extension.
Garges KJ; Nourbakhsh A; Morris R; Yang J; Mody M; Patterson R
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 Oct; 31(8):563-9. PubMed ID: 18984238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Compressive preload reduces segmental flexion instability after progressive destabilization of the lumbar spine.
Fry RW; Alamin TF; Voronov LI; Fielding LC; Ghanayem AJ; Parikh A; Carandang G; Mcintosh BW; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(2):E74-81. PubMed ID: 24153162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous fusion device and bilateral pedicle screw system as additional fixation for lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Lee WE; Vrionis FD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 25577548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of neighboring segments on the measurement of segmental stiffness in the intact lumbar spine.
van Engelen SJ; Bisschop A; Smit TH; van Royen BJ; van Dieën JH
Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1302-9. PubMed ID: 24215901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Defining the Neutral Zone of sheep intervertebral joints during dynamic motions: an in vitro study.
Thompson RE; Barker TM; Pearcy MJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Feb; 18(2):89-98. PubMed ID: 12550806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of tensioning the lumbar fasciae on segmental stiffness during flexion and extension: Young Investigator Award winner.
Barker PJ; Guggenheimer KT; Grkovic I; Briggs CA; Jones DC; Thomas CD; Hodges PW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 16481949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single level lumbar laminectomy alters segmental biomechanical behavior without affecting adjacent segments.
Bisschop A; van Engelen SJ; Kingma I; Holewijn RM; Stadhouder A; van der Veen AJ; van Dieën JH; van Royen BJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Sep; 29(8):912-7. PubMed ID: 25028214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
